- 21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@bowyer.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:40:44 +0100
- Yes, I completely agree that the rules we've been discussing relate to the reciprocal licensee as control operator. Where they're not the control operator, their licensing status is irrelevant. It re
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00111.html (17,592 bytes)
- 22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
- Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:44:43 -0400
- Somehow RHR manages to do it with their Maine location. If you have reliable stuff you won't have a problem. 73, Ria, N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00124.html (12,781 bytes)
- 23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
- Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 06:39:19 -0600
- Just read the 3830 writeup of KU1CW in WPX to see how things can go wrong. Barry W2UP 73 Steve KL7SB Why it is out of line? I have taken far more abuse on the forum than that. Paul does not like anyt
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00125.html (13,342 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu