Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Self\s+Spotting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Self\s+Spotting\s*$/: 134 ]

Total 134 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:10:26 -0600; I'm thinking a couple weeks out... to SS cw...and considering... just exactly how this plays out... trying to get wrapped around it, to increase my amount of enjoyment, not necessarily the score. So.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00302.html (9,557 bytes)
62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:50:43 -0700; If we allow self-spotting, it's a very short step to allowing stations to exchange information or confirm contacts via the spotting network (this seems to happen sometimes in the VHF+ weak signal wor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00305.html (8,638 bytes)
63. Re: [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:56:30 -0700; Well - I think there is still some unfairness here... If I am LOUD, I can call CQ and likely get spotted fairly quickly. I don't have to self spot. If I am weak - it might take me forever to get spot; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00312.html (10,329 bytes)
64. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:55:46 -0600; That's a good question, Dave. It's no more "encouraged" outside of contests than during contests. I see maybe ONE complaint every couple of days (usually from a European) complaining about someone se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00316.html (9,153 bytes)
65. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:42:25 -0800; The spotting network, a separate wired communications network, already facilitates QSOs in amateur radio contests. That's a foolish state of affairs because it undermines the nature of amateur radio.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00317.html (9,627 bytes)
66. Re: [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:26:58 -0800; What you're saying above, Tree, is that dependence on "the spot" has become so ubiquitous that the mainstream contester is no longer likely to search out that "stray mult in the wilderness" unless h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00326.html (9,199 bytes)
67. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:25:46 -0700; I'm not going to even touch the subject of spotting (self or otherwise) in general, but within a contest it seems to me that this entire discussion about what is proper and what isn't totally misses; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00327.html (9,690 bytes)
68. [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:11:44 +0700; 1. I will self spot anytime off a contest. See why. 2. If I am not spotted during a contest, I will get bored and lay off for hours; no help if you need me as a mult. See why. Today there is no known; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00226.html (7,754 bytes)
69. Re: [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:33:28 +0600; Charly, None has the right to call himself super station without skimmer installed and connected to RBN. Set up skimmer in HS land, bridge the gap and help yourself as well as many others. Then there; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00229.html (9,262 bytes)
70. Re: [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1): Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:50:28 -0600; Then the community should get together and patch that hole in the network. Would you be interested in hosting/maintaining a skimmer in your area? I am sure you can understand that if self spotting wa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00235.html (8,398 bytes)
71. Re: [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 07:29:14 -0400; I'm happy to report that the RBN team is working on a series of efforts to start up new Skimmers in mainland Asia, South and Southeast Asia, Central and South America, and Africa. A node in Hong Kong; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00242.html (8,626 bytes)
72. [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1): Author: Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 22:27:15 +0000 (UTC); I have no problem with self spotting as long as those who do, compete (or are placed by the competition committee) in the 'assisted' category. I hope that there will always be a competitive class for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00216.html (7,200 bytes)
73. [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1): Author: Shelby Summerville <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:03:20 -0500; N2IC wrote: "Why not simply allow self spotting on SSB" I see no difference in self spotting than those that make a spot, only to find the spotting station there, instead of whom was spotted? 73, She; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00165.html (7,152 bytes)
74. [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:21:27 -0500; Why don't we just skip the radio part and just work each other in a chat room. That would be the fairest right? Radiosport is ABOUT communicating over the airwaves and putting what we hear in the log; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00180.html (8,267 bytes)
75. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:48:09 -0600; I am very surprised that nobody has created a huge multi user version of DR. DX for the internet. I would be great fun. DR. DX was pretty amazing for the time. I know there is a modern day equivalent; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00186.html (11,248 bytes)
76. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 08:46:47 -0700; I personally think Self Spotting is the end of contesting as we know it and should NEVER be allowed. 1981: Substitute "Computers" for "Self Spotting" 1987: Substitute "Packet" for "Self Spotting" 200; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00190.html (8,222 bytes)
77. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1): Author: Ed K1EP <k1ep.list@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:04:12 -0500; "The point of contests should be to make lots of contacts. " Not necessarily. The point for some, is to FIND lots of contacts, not just make them. Everyone is different. When single op, I don't use s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00191.html (12,747 bytes)
78. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:33:24 -0600; and when there are few contacts to me made or found, people stop looking and do something else. W0MU Not necessarily. The point for some, is to FIND lots of contacts, not just make them. Everyone is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00198.html (13,125 bytes)
79. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1): Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 18:09:01 +0000; Mike, I am getting pretty tired of your constant plea (rant) for new rules that allow everything that the Internet can provide at the cost of diminishing RF communication to a mere fraction of the ga; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00205.html (14,913 bytes)
80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:50:33 +0000; There is nothing magical, mystical or fantastic about unassisted anymore. Mike is right - in just the same way as There is nothing magical, mystical or fantastic anymore about using only the wind, w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00216.html (9,219 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]