Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+TO7A\s+debacle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+TO7A\s+debacle\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:02:05 -0400 (EDT); N3QE reminds me that we've seen this before: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QsFDpTEl84 enjoy 73 Frank W3LPL -- Original Message -- From: "Braco OE1EMS" <oe1ems@emssolutions.at> To: cq-contest@conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00300.html (20,323 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:15:16 -0400 (EDT); OE3V appears twice in the TO7A log but never in the CN2AA, 9K2HN, K3LR or W3LPL log... -- Original Message -- Wow what a mess..... I realy never expected that someone can do this! OE3V is btw callsig; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00301.html (19,902 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:28:32 -0400; Oh what a tangled web we weave, when we seek to deceive. Had he submitted a "clean" log he would have still swept first place for assisted. Now, his call is being dragged through the mud. He's a grea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00302.html (20,980 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 21:12:57 +0500; These are the results (advatages) of making participant's logs public. 73, Igor UA9CDC -- Original Message -- From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net> To: "'Dez Watson'" <g3ww.dez@virgin.net>;; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00307.html (14,593 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:11:24 +0200; DL3TU only antennas are 10-40m. 73 Peter --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Don Field Sent: Montag, 11. Mai 2015 13:37 To: donovanf@starpowe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00308.html (21,904 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: Kostas SV1DPI <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:43:49 +0300; Maybe the Contest Committee need to make the logs public in an earlier time before the results are publicized. This way everyone can make his observations. 73 Kostas SV1DPI PS By the way the TO7A QSO; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00309.html (15,639 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:06:39 -0600; I wonder if this was all after the contest log manipulation or does he have some nefarious program running that inserts calls into the log during down periods? Mike W0MU On 5/11/2015 5:55 AM, Randy T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00310.html (14,143 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:31:16 +0100; I need to correct my earlier posting regarding my friend G3ZHL - it appears he did take part in CQWW CW, using the CW decoder in his K3. *Don,* *Yes, I was active on 29th and 30th November, but just; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00320.html (23,765 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: "Roberts, Will" <Will.Roberts@duke-energy.com>; Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 15:17:51 +0000; If someone was feeding calls to TO7A to try and have him disqualified, wouldn't these have likely been picked up by an SDR somewhere? As I recall reading in these posts, there were no SDR records fou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00331.html (9,386 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>; Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 15:22:09 -0400; Sunshine is the best remedy. The single best act Randy has done is making the logs public. Now, crowd sourcing of log review is a pretty simple effort. SDR + RBN + crowdsourcing: pretty much no way t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00335.html (10,076 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:07:44 -0500; wow ! I am amazed at most of this, not surprised (I am not that naive), disappointed mainly it used to be all Hams were trusted to a high degree A hand shake or word of declaration on a contest entry; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00347.html (12,229 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 16:10:39 +0200; SM2BLY on 160m is creative logging, I checked with SM2BLY and he did not work TO7A on 160m. Seems like CQ did catch a very bad fish. 73 Jim SM2EKM -- On 2015-05-11 08:38, donovanf@starpower.net wrote; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00348.html (11,105 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:37:56 -0400; I render no opinion one way or the other on the TO7A "debacle" except to point out that I have a nice set up on 160 with three Beverages on Europe. Sometimes they are phased for even better S/N. I am; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00353.html (11,295 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: Jeff Kinzli <kinzli@kinzlicoils.com>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 07:57:20 -0700; Agreed. Wouldn't it be cool if we (as the contest community) could have access to the SDR recordings of the CQWW weekend, from all the different recording spots (or even just a few)? I know the bandw; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00354.html (11,326 bytes)
35. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 20:07:12 +0300; Correction, Len SM5AOG, worked him on 15 meters the day before, but never on 20 meters as claimed. Sorry for typo 73 de RM2D Mats _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing li; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00360.html (14,232 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 19:59:54 +0300; The same story regarding SM5AOG in that fabricated 20 meter run. Len worked TO7A on 20 meter the day before. At the time of the claimed 20 meter contact, he worked ZW5B on 15 meter. Shortly before, h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00361.html (13,334 bytes)
37. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 13:29:48 -0400 (EDT); Hi Jeff, The amazing aspect of Ut5UGR's cheat is that each of his public logs provides 100 percent of the information needed to detect a prove the cheat beyond a reasonable doubt. 73 Frank W3LPL Agre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00363.html (12,022 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 37
Page: [1] [2]