Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+authentication\s+for\s+log\s+submission\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou@voyackey.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:28:34 +0900 (JST)
Change the subject from the original, and removed related References headers. } In the days of paper logs, we had to submit a signed } declaration with each log. With electronic logs, the } declarati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00072.html (7,928 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 08:36:39 -0500
Are you saying that someone can get hold of another station's log after it has been submitted and tamper with it? If that's the case, then the security needs to be placed on the computer where the lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00076.html (10,032 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: Mirko S57AD <miroslav.sibilja@amis.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:17:09 +0200
I don't know for other sponsors, in EUHFC & SCC RTTY contests, sponsored by SCC, if someone submits a log a second time, it wipes out the earlier log. 73 Mirko, S57AD ________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00078.html (11,424 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:18:52 -0600
What he is saying is that if I submit a score for W0MU, someone else can send another log overwriting my original submission with some bogus information. You don't have to get a hold of anything. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00081.html (11,702 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:11:37 -0600
If and when crap like that happens, it's time to find something else to do. Barry W2UP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00083.html (13,328 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:21:48 -0500
It seems to me that a totally fabricated log would stand out when log checking is done. If I were the contest sponsor, I'd get suspicious if the log checking results showed 99% errors in QSO's. And t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00084.html (14,136 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:40:46 -0400
Don, you are a man after my own heart! I'm totally paranoid about security scenarios, which is one reason LoTW security is so tight. However, I think the scenario you describe isn't plausible. As I u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00087.html (12,248 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:06:18 -0600
Actually the question is how would the ARRL, NCJ or CQ know that AA1AA submitted a 1.1 million score and then I submitted some other log for something less. Nobody needs to get the original log. It w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00088.html (14,026 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: "Christian Schneider" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:48:31 +0200
quote: "...the best solution would be to use the LoTW authentication system for log submissions. That would have the dual advantage of verifying the call sign in the log and allowing automatic submis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00090.html (9,473 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: Luc Moreira <py8azt@dxbrasil.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:46:01 -0300
On CQMM DX Contest, we considered the fake logs possibility. So, robot save every log sent in (correct or not) on database. If you send in your log 2, 3 or 10 times, we have each version of your log
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00092.html (10,658 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:05:46 -0700
I've always thought that such an extreme level of security for LoTW was wildly inappropriate given the numerous ways that people can and do cheat in DXCC. It's like installing a bombproof door on the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00094.html (9,938 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: "VE1DT" <VE1DT@infinichron.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:06:50 -0300
There is a simple safeguard to prevent this occurrence. Whenever I enter a log, I look for confirmation that the log was received by the sponsor. I prefer the type of feedback that confirms my log wa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00097.html (14,132 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:25:59 +0100 (BST)
There is a simple safeguard to prevent this occurrence. It may not be so simple.   Whilst, prima facia, the earlier analogy of 'howitzers and unicorns'  may appear an apt one, Dick, and  guys who adm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00099.html (16,856 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou@voyackey.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:39:18 +0900 (JST)
Dick, } Don, you are a man after my own heart! I'm totally paranoid about security } scenarios, which is one reason LoTW security is so tight. Thank you very much for your comment. It makes sense to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00100.html (10,660 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou@voyackey.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:24:02 +0900 (JST)
} And the e-mail of the log } sent should have all the header info and could be checked with the person } who supposedly sent the log to verify it came from him/her. An e-mail } header contains much
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00101.html (10,803 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: "Christian Schneider" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:52:56 +0200
How about the practice of some contests to simply publish preliminary rankings after the log checking is done? Everyone interested can check his score for one or two weeks and can report problems bef
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00104.html (9,905 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:17:41 -0400
It's not as easy to cheat in DXCC as you think. You might be able to get away with a faked QSL or two with non-rare countries, which is pretty meaningless, but it's very difficult to cheat on a semi-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00105.html (12,535 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:01:16 -0400
Not true. Without access to AA1AA's log, how exactly would you construct the AA1AA log that has a lower score? Exactly what QSOs would you put in it? Remember, every QSO must match a QSO in another l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00106.html (17,116 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: "Yannick DEVOS (XV4Y)" <yannick.devos@online.fr>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:18:21 +0700
Dear Katsuhiro, Michael, Katsuhiro, you are right this is a serious security flaw in the way the log submission are handled. It can lead to spoofing (someone use your identity to upload logs) and flo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00107.html (9,703 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] authentication for log submission (score: 1)
Author: "Yannick DEVOS (XV4Y)" <yannick.devos@online.fr>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:25:36 +0700
Sorry Dick, that was you I wanted to quote about LotW. As you state, forging a fake log that seems genuine enough but harmful to the score is something with a low probability. Making the submission d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00108.html (13,444 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu