Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cqcontest\.net\s*$/: 93 ]

Total 93 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:10:25 -0500 (CDT)
Well, I agree with Paul that we're going around in circles here. IMHO, if you connect to an external source to get ANY information during the contest, information which is directly or indirectly deri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00071.html (13,488 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:14:03 -0300
would be good, at least to stop all the same topic every 2-3 months :-) 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W -- 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00072.html (20,864 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:46:59 +0300
breakdown information (and it doesn't), then it is not *assistance*. The contest in question is CQ WPX. There is no mentioning about scoreboard in CQ WPX rule set. CQ WW FAQ guidance: "Q: As a Singl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00077.html (9,304 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:30:16 -0500
Or, we could simply limit our interpretations of the term "assisted" to what the rules actually say and not try to read into them anything beyond the printed word. The rules say spots, however genera
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00078.html (20,712 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:03:55 +0000 (UTC)
Sounds like a good idea, Randy. Let innovation prevail. Rudy N2WQ From: Randy Thompson K5ZD <k5zd@charter.net> To: cq-contest@contesting.com Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 8:07 AM Subject: Re: [CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00079.html (20,376 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:25:21 +0000
Yes. Simplifying rather than adding more and more categories, most of which allow unfair participants to take advantage over those who play by the rules. 73, Martin LU5DX On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 9:07 AM,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00080.html (17,446 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Ivo Jereb" <ivo.jereb@siol.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:31:43 +0200
Randy, thats it. A simple solution. Ivo, S57AL There is another option... Rather than continue to get twisted in defining the separation, we could merge SO and SOA into one and remove all confusion.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00081.html (19,275 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:54:58 -0400
I hope that this does not happen. The CQ WPX RTTY contest also has no unassisted category. This pushes operators to use the cluster to be competitive instead of using their SO2R S&P skills. John KK9A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00082.html (8,593 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:01:55 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Randy: It is clear that Radiosport will not follow the model of Golf or bicycle racing - prohibiting use of advanced technologies (e.g., rangefinders and GPS in golf, motors in bicycle racing). Ho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00084.html (21,313 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 14:09:46 +0000
Yes, and it also eliminates one of the many not so controllable -to say the least -, factors of our beloved so called radio sport. 73, Martin LU5DX On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 10:54 AM, john@kk9a.com john@kk
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00085.html (9,450 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:13:35 -0400
One would argue the cluster helps you maximize the use of the second radio by quickly identifying mults. Rudy N2WQ Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate autocorre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00086.html (10,053 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:41:26 -0400
This discussion seems to come up every season. We seem to go from being very 30,000 feet to very granular in our approaches and then swing the other direction. Some say that getting any information o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00087.html (19,123 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:18:38 +0100
There is another option... Rather than continue to get twisted in defining the separation, we could merge SO and SOA into one and remove all confusion. There could be an overlay category for the guy
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00090.html (10,601 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Davor Kucelin" <davor.kucelin@plavalaguna.hr>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 18:49:15 +0200
Randy got the point. Combine both categorys into one. Overlay classic or whatever. Nobody else notices we have too many SO Categories. Soab,sosb everything in 3 power levels and than separated again
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00091.html (8,646 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:19:28 -0400
Ditto the KD4D post. Why don't we let the unassisted operators decide whether the concern of assisted ops invading our category is worth eliminating it over the concern? No reason to merge the 2 cate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00093.html (8,864 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:34:49 -0400
The funny thing is that people pick and chose what unassisted or traditional means. If you want to be hard core and have no assistance then trash your computer and do all logging, dupe checking, mult
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00094.html (24,066 bytes)

57. [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 17:29:52 +0000
Somebody said: There is another option... ..., we could merge SO and SOA into one and remove all confusion. There could be an overlay category for the guys who want to compare themselves to other "cl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00095.html (10,059 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:01:32 +0000 (UTC)
Actually, the contest sponsors choose it. 73, Mark, KD4D The funny thing is that people pick and chose what unassisted or traditional means. If you want to be hard core and have no assistance then tr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00096.html (24,305 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:29:09 -0400
That's precisely the point. The WPX rules are pretty clear, allowing scoreboards, but everyone who does not agree with them comes up with their own definition of what assistance is. Rudy N2WQ Sent us
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00097.html (26,142 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 22:57:58 +0200
I'd say you already passed ;-) 73, Maarten PD2R _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00099.html (8,154 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu