Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+to\s+FCC\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+to\s+FCC\.\.\.\s*$/: 144 ]

Total 144 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:24:35 +0000; The two exceptions have been some of the battery chargers and power supplies imported from various countries and, of course, the grow lights ARRL recently tested. FCC does do some spot checking, but; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00047.html (10,104 bytes)
102. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:37:17 -0500; That's one of the reasons I'm a member ... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00048.html (9,269 bytes)
103. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:54:20 +0000; Hi, Dale, I have seen issues with many of the certification reports approved by the TCBs, but most are not really impacting the EMC performance of the product, so are generally "harmless." The certif; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00049.html (13,359 bytes)
104. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:22:14 -0500; Thanks Ed, So you actually have looked at some of this paper yourself? Yes, I am speculating, but having had experience with this from my previous work, I know for a fact that some certifications can; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00050.html (15,601 bytes)
105. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:40:10 -0700; Ed, As an aside-- We in the "legal grow" states thank you, and the ARRL for testing and reporting those offending lights! Here is an example as to why your tests will help... It is a real mess in my; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00051.html (13,395 bytes)
106. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:53:01 -0500; Before, the whole business was illegal so there were other considerations. Now the product itself is legal but I'll bet your local zoning code does not provide for houses being converted to greenhous; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00052.html (9,823 bytes)
107. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:04:37 -0700; Hi Peter, Thanks for the suggestion, but alas, no go here... Growing is allowed because of the Medical laws, it allows growing in any area, any zone. Our only recourse out this way is locate and turn; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00055.html (12,976 bytes)
108. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:42:45 +0000; Those of us in "illegal grow" states might actually be at a substantial advantage. I personally couldn't care less what kind of plants a neighbour is growing on his own property, especially for his; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00056.html (10,754 bytes)
109. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:29:02 -0600; Don, Your advice is right on. One of the growers that I built filters for offered to introduce me to other growers if they were interfering with my radio. Tom W0IVJ It is a real mess in my local area; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00057.html (11,575 bytes)
110. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:21:05 -0700; Hi Don, You are correct, you in the non-legal states do have an advantage, and for exactly your stated reasons... We in the "legal" states, don't enjoy the additional enforcement that comes with ille; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00058.html (15,087 bytes)
111. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:22:10 -0700; Tom, I hate to bring this up, but arn't you worried about being sued if one of those filters explodes? -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW su; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00059.html (13,796 bytes)
112. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 18:52:43 -0500; If the FCC can get involved to the point of having pin pointed a couple of hams intentional interfering with other hams, then why can't they also get involved with finding interfering noise sources t; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00060.html (8,593 bytes)
113. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:09:28 -0600; Dave, Yes, but what choice do I have...besides I could be sued for anything. _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00061.html (8,637 bytes)
114. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: <n0tt1@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 01:35:00 +0000; Lawsuit? Not likely. It's called "Barbershop Advice" and a person should not be held liable for giving that kind of advice....run through the courts many years ago. OTOH, if the advice is paid, prof; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00062.html (8,415 bytes)
115. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 20:37:54 -0500; I googled around looking at Oregon's medical marijuana rules. Dispensaries are only allowed in commercial, industrial, and mixed-use zones. There was no mention of where grow sites are allowed but di; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00063.html (11,101 bytes)
116. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:55:29 +0000; "I am not enough of a lawyer to know what the line is for how much I can help a grower quiet down an operation, it is after all still not legal federally..." I'm not a lawyer either. I too am wonderi; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00064.html (10,649 bytes)
117. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:09:18 -0700; Hi, You are a kind and good gentlemen! I like the mindset you have! Thank you for your filters, etc... -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW su; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00065.html (9,406 bytes)
118. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:29:48 -0700; Hi Charlie, Is "Barbershop Advice" an actual legal term, and is there precedent for it's use in the courts? If so, could you supply a link please. I just do what the lawyer tells me to do to reduce r; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00066.html (10,395 bytes)
119. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:45:50 -0700; Peter, Thank you for the check... Unfortunately I have come to the same conclusion-- the laws are not clear at all in Oregon. About the only thing a ham can do to help along the lines of legal grows,; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00067.html (13,630 bytes)
120. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: <w5gn@mxg.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:50:53 -0500; A town with but not enough work for one lawyer, has more than sufficient work, when there are two. Barry, EI/W5GN Hi Charlie, Is "Barbershop Advice" an actual legal term, and is there precedent for i; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00068.html (10,633 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]