Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+to\s+FCC\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+to\s+FCC\.\.\.\s*$/: 144 ]

Total 144 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 09:11:33 -0700; Ed, I chair our clubs RFI committee, and we help locate RFI for hams that can't. Your comment has hit one of my major concerns right square on the head! One of my nightmares is that I help a grower t; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00069.html (15,785 bytes)
122. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:45:03 -0500; Deliverance County banned grow ops. :-) I get that you don't want your name brought up so just stick to the RFI part and how this is a commercial-scale operation in a residential area and not discuss; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00070.html (10,899 bytes)
123. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: CR <ka5s@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:02:26 -0400; And then there's the NEC and safety: http://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=http%3A%2F%2Fregulatorydesign.com%2FIs%2520NRTL%2520Marking%2520Required%2520by%2520Law.doc _____________________; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00071.html (8,871 bytes)
124. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:21:06 -0700; 100% agree! Glad this helped! Please keep me posed on what you come up with in your local area. It helps me with ideas for keeping Oregon RFI free. I try and never even refer to a grow operation as s; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00072.html (11,795 bytes)
125. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:23:08 -0700; Oregon is looking at this, or something like this as part of it's legalization efforts, that is why I believe the time is right for getting rules inserted that deal with RFI as well... It looks like; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00073.html (9,850 bytes)
126. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:13:26 +0000; I think you are being a slightly paranoid. How are at risk of being sued for informing someone, especially a law-violator, that they are attracting attention by generating a nuisance in the community; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00074.html (18,223 bytes)
127. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:57:05 -0500; Potential civil actions may not be a big risk, but growing marijuana is still a federal crime. Not sure I'd like to have items with my name on them found in a DEA raid, especially if those items told; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00075.html (9,350 bytes)
128. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:08:18 -0700; Hi Don, I don't think I am being slightly paranoid at all. I think I am making a set of informed decisions, and seeking legal advice in making those decisions. I asked the lawyer a smiler question to; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00076.html (26,653 bytes)
129. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:09:38 -0700; You have exactly espoused my thoughts here Peter, thank you! -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW support see; http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/gro; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00077.html (10,087 bytes)
130. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:24:49 -0700; I forgot to mention my thoughts on your comment below... Grow lights are legal ONLY when they meet FCC RFI standards... If they don't then they are not legal, and should be removed, and all imports s; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00078.html (16,339 bytes)
131. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:49:21 -0600; Dave, IMHO I think you post waaaaaaay too much!!!!!! Remember when all is said and done, more is said than is done. Larry I don't think I am being slightly paranoid at all. I think I am making a set; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00079.html (13,869 bytes)
132. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:56:21 -0700; Thank you for your input. -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW support see; http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info for Dopplergram infor; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00080.html (8,776 bytes)
133. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:26:06 +0000; Let me offer a few quick points, in between meetings. If you tell a neighbor that YOUR RFI problem is solved, but that you can't speak for other frequencies such as police, fire, etc., I can't imagin; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00081.html (16,199 bytes)
134. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:30:57 +0000; ALL of the lights we have tested have been way above the limits. All are subject to formal complaint. One FCC Citation was issued to a grower on the west coast. I also have heard that the FCC Lab is; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00082.html (17,566 bytes)
135. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 08:43:00 -0700; I strongly agree, Ed. I first encountered this in the home that we bought in California in 2006. It has several low voltage lighting fixtures, all run with what the electrical supply houses call "ele; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00083.html (9,053 bytes)
136. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:20:12 -0700; Hello Ed, Thanks for the info on AM Ed, I will start checking down there as well in our runs... All we are trying to do is reduce our risk in dealing with RFI, not zero it... :) I will be happy when; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00084.html (18,325 bytes)
137. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 01:42:31 -0700; Hmm... If you're in an illegal state would there be any benefit/risk in simply reporting your suspicions to the DEA along with documentation linking grow op lighting to RFI and your current RFI envir; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00085.html (12,925 bytes)
138. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:01:39 +0000; I think that would be opening a can of worms you would rather keep closed. Not to condone breaking any laws, but I would much rather have someone in the house next door minding his own business and; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00091.html (11,176 bytes)
139. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:31:14 +0000; The marijuana growers are very concerned that their operation emits a clearly identifiable noise signature. During the growing season, they use a 16 hour on cycle, changing to 12 hours as the crop is; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00092.html (12,545 bytes)
140. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:36:00 -0400; Hi Ed, By law, here in Ontario, a real estate agent is mandated to tell any & all prospective buyers of a home if the place was ever the site of a violent death (as in murder), or if there was ever a; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00093.html (9,475 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]