Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+to\s+FCC\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+to\s+FCC\.\.\.\s*$/: 144 ]

Total 144 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:40:24 -0700; The U.S. gummint has no authority whatever over manufacturers in other countries, especially China. The only ones our gummint can go after are the importers and sellers. Ken Gordon W7EKB ____________; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00073.html (9,692 bytes)
22. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:42:32 -0500; I believe that kind of attitude is part of the problem. I will do and have done everything I can to help neighbors. But I won't appease their intransigence; when they dig in their heels I happily cal; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00074.html (12,725 bytes)
23. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:55:10 -0500; David, it helps to have more than one ham station affected. Three against the neighbor lends some support to the problem and ultimate resolve, especially if your ham friend is 6 ft 5 in, 240 and a bo; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00075.html (14,513 bytes)
24. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:56:57 -0500; Laura Smith pretty much said the exact same thing at a 2012 forum. The FCC will not take any blanket action against manufacturers unless Congress approves and directs it to do so. You can complain to; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00076.html (9,356 bytes)
25. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:59:33 -0700; That's what I thought. Thanks. OK. I got the NM-20B operational a day or two ago. Works very well for its intended purpose. Trouble is, I also bought a damned Chinese-made inverter to power it with w; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00077.html (9,867 bytes)
26. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:00:37 -0500; Ken, they have authority (or should have) over items that hit our shores. What the off shore mfg does with the product after it's been rejected is their problem. A few rejections I'm quite sure would; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00078.html (10,219 bytes)
27. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:02:25 +0000; Hate to beat a dead horse, but just thinking outside the box a little on this Friday. Perhaps Dale's neighbor works for the mob? If that were the case, I also wouldn't want to anger the neighbor. ;-); /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00079.html (14,650 bytes)
28. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "David Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:16:07 -0500; Dale.....I must say that with an attitude like yours you must be easy pickins when you walk down the street. Guy comes up to you says 'gimme your lunch money'...you fork it over....he eats, you don't; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00080.html (16,641 bytes)
29. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:25:31 -0500; Ken if you have 20 db over noise then it's got to be very close to your antenna. If it's power line noise you should hear it on 10 meters and to zero in get a air band receiver (its AM and vhf), zero; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00083.html (10,919 bytes)
30. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:30:22 +0000 (UTC); Ken brings up a good point. How many of us buy goods on ebay which is shipped directly form China because the price is right. How many of us check to see if it meets FCC Part 15? The most effective o; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00084.html (10,487 bytes)
31. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:40:09 -0500; Hi David, I hear ya, but I can handle myself pretty well, in other words nobody takes my lunch without paying for it :). I have had a very good relationship with the local power company, Xcel Energy,; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00085.html (19,153 bytes)
32. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:40:34 -0700; I have felt the same. However, finding it has been difficult. It is on 24/7 with, very seldom, very short periods of complete silence. I do hear it on 10 meters, although it is not as bad. I've tried; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00086.html (10,683 bytes)
33. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:20:30 -0700; I understand why the FCC doesn't want to force every device to meet such strict standards that it can't possibly cause harmful interference. What I don't understand is why the FCC isn't willing/able; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00088.html (12,642 bytes)
34. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "David Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:24:32 -0500; There you go again....you just don't get it. I hope you enjoy listening to that plasma. You are absolutely correct in that you and the neighbor shouldn't have to resolve the problem. This is exactly; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00089.html (20,031 bytes)
35. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:48:36 -0600; Do you really think we need more gov't to be involved with inspecting and testing EVERY item that is made so that it does not hurt people, cause interference and on and on and on. We would never see; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00094.html (10,511 bytes)
36. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: CR <ka5s@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:45:39 -0400; When we're cheated by a merchant who sells noncompliant equipment, we have to act ourselves to recover the cost of replacing non-compliant equiment or bringing it into compliance wit FCC Rules. The F; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00097.html (12,898 bytes)
37. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Dale <svetanoff@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:42:11 -0500 (GMT-05:00); Kelly, Please consider that the neighbor's $1000 TV MIGHT actually meet standards. Can the ham prove that it doesn't? THAT's the problem. In that case, the solution to the RFI situation has 6 answers; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00099.html (13,284 bytes)
38. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Jim Kennedy" <kennedyjp@cableone.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:09:40 -0500; Hi Folks, , this certainly is an interesting thread but its time for a reality check. The offending broadband emitting consumer devices are not going away anytime in the near future. The FCC is so fa; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00101.html (14,690 bytes)
39. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:52:04 -0400; advertise or sell non-compliant apparatus or equipment." The problem is much larger than product coming in from large manufacturers. With so many small vendors from Asia getting thousands of electro; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00102.html (9,963 bytes)
40. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "David Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:12:29 -0500; Hi Jim..... I have had an ANC-4 for quite a while.....if I had known you were going to spend money on one of those things I would have given you mine. It has worked only occasionally for me....it's j; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00103.html (15,001 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]