Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+to\s+FCC\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+to\s+FCC\.\.\.\s*$/: 144 ]

Total 144 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:17:51 -0500; Jim, Thanks for your reasoned response. I agree. I too have the noise canx devices, more than one here and they do help to a point. I've contacted the local noise source and we have good relationship; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00104.html (16,751 bytes)
42. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:24:35 -0600; You think you have problems? I can only imagine the noise the is going to be created by the light rail that they intend to extend past my house. As it is now, I can drive next to the existing line wi; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00105.html (16,654 bytes)
43. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:50:42 -0500; Mike, In your case will you be knocking on the light rail office door and complain? They will laugh at you, so much for complaining. I doubt the FCC will help either, it's much larger than the FCC, i; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00107.html (19,573 bytes)
44. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:43:53 -0600; If it is a problem I will do what I can. Hopefully we will be in warmer climates for prime radioing and it will probably be a few years before they get this far. I don't expect them to do much of any; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00108.html (17,833 bytes)
45. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 23:06:31 -0700; Hi, I kept very careful notes, of every test I did, and every test the power company did in relation to the RFI. Of the discussions I had with the neighbor, and I did it for weeks... Then and only th; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00137.html (10,890 bytes)
46. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:04:47 +0000; If the ARRL Lab can get some reports involving specific model numbers, we can do some testing and find out where these plasma sets stand. I had a report in MD that involved two Samsung plasma TVs. On; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00167.html (10,337 bytes)
47. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:27:18 -0700; How about going to vendors like Costco, poking around with a talkie, and buying one that appears noisy? Then either sell the test sample if it's clean like any other product you would test, or return; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00169.html (9,851 bytes)
48. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:29:17 -0500; Ed I'll see if I can get that information from my neighbor, but it will take a while. I have to actually get in the house and look at the back of the TV and get the model number because I don't think; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00170.html (11,140 bytes)
49. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:31:27 +0000; Thanks, Dale. We can then see if the TV is still in production. If it is no longer manufacturered, it may be a harmful interference complaint, not a possible emissions-limit violation. The ARRL Lab w; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00171.html (11,923 bytes)
50. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:49:54 -0500; Once when I had access to the TV, I tried one of those outlet strips with filtering and it made no difference. I would have liked to spend a couple hours troubleshooting his house, but I felt too muc; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00173.html (13,435 bytes)
51. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:34:17 -0700; I would not expect it to. They only affect the differential mode signal. As Ed has noted, the signal can be radiated common mode on the power cable, on an antenna (or CATV) cable, and even on cables; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00175.html (9,990 bytes)
52. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:56:22 +0000; Hi, Jim, What I am suspecting is that we may need to install the following filters: Differntial-mode AC filter Common-mode choke on AC mains Common-mode choke on incoming coaxial cable Common-mode ch; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00176.html (11,172 bytes)
53. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:00:54 -0500; Yes, I agree. The outlet strip was a bad choice but all I had at the time to try. I am going to make up a choke per your paper which I have and first chance I get I'll try it out on their set. I use; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00177.html (10,721 bytes)
54. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:04:41 +0000; Dale, The ARRL Lab can also buy a "brute-force" filter for you to try, as these can be pretty pricey. We had the complainant in MD willing to try, but his neighbor stopped cooperating, then the ham m; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00178.html (11,731 bytes)
55. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:36:44 -0700; What I am suspecting is that we may need to install the following filters: Differntial-mode AC filter Common-mode choke on AC mains Common-mode choke on incoming coaxial cable Common-mode choke on an; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00179.html (12,999 bytes)
56. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:42:41 -0500; What would be really great is if the ARRL would make available a searchable database of appliances for those shopping for a new TV, washing machine, etc. That way we would know what to buy, or avoid.; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00184.html (11,082 bytes)
57. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:52:45 -0700; Even better, make a serious attempt to interface with Consumers Union, and get their reviews to reject products that fail to meet Part 15 Class B. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00185.html (9,047 bytes)
58. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:28:41 -0600; Ed, I checked out a few plasma tv sets a couple of years ago with a portable shortwave receiver. The RFI was coming right out of the front of the set which made sense since that was where the dischar; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00186.html (12,363 bytes)
59. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:25:15 -0500; Tom, Did you happen to check how far that radiation extended that came directly from the set? I'm curious to know because the one I'm dealing with is about 140 or so feet from my antenna and if that; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00187.html (14,086 bytes)
60. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:16:58 -0700; Imagine thousands of little lightening bolts... Thats Plasma TV. -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW support see; http://groups.yahoo.com/neo; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00189.html (14,707 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]