Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+to\s+FCC\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+to\s+FCC\.\.\.\s*$/: 144 ]

Total 144 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:26:53 -0600; Dale, I was in a store and just moved from tv to tv. Just the plasma tv sets were noisy but I was only a few feet away. If I had it to do over again I would have clamped my rf probe around the power; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00190.html (13,826 bytes)
62. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:23:41 -0500; My next door plasma is broadband hash with various bumps along the way. I have one of those bumps especially bad at 3.857, it's 20 db over 9 and sounds like a motor running but changing speed and som; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00192.html (15,956 bytes)
63. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:18:32 -0600; Dale, I checked with Costco and they only carry LED back lit TV sets now. In thinking about it further, I don't think making a measurement on the power cord with an RF current probe would be too defi; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00197.html (16,205 bytes)
64. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:44:21 -0500; Tom, I'd love to do a lot of stuff with their tv, but it's not my house and I hate to impose on them. I have to catch the neighbor outside on a weekend and chat with him a little and maybe something; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00199.html (19,339 bytes)
65. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:51:40 -0500 (CDT); how much time and effort have you already spent on this? how much more is it going to cost to get your antique noise hunting stuff working? you can buy a brand new 40" LED TV for under $400, why not; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00200.html (18,331 bytes)
66. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:12:32 +0000; And if you do all this, we want a link to a video showing the event! ;-) how much time and effort have you already spent on this? how much more is it going to cost to get your antique noise hunting s; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00201.html (19,632 bytes)
67. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:25:30 -0700; Oh, no! Not a car. A Pulaski, or an axe, or a sledgehammer is SO MUCH more satisfying!. Ken W7EKB _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.cont; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00202.html (8,711 bytes)
68. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:29:06 +0000; One report I received back indicated that one plasma TV was cured with common-mode chokes, but two other models were not. All were Samsung products. Tom, I'd love to do a lot of stuff with their tv,; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00203.html (20,294 bytes)
69. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:24:22 -0600; Ed, As you well know, all common mode chokes are not created equally. Do you have any details on the chokes that did and did not work? Tom W0IVJ Tom, I'd love to do a lot of stuff with their tv, but; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00204.html (18,286 bytes)
70. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:00:35 -0400; Hi Tom, I'm the one that reported the 3 Samsung Plasma TV cases to Ed and the ARRL, and in all cases the common mode chokes were the same (14 turns of a power cord on a 2.4" OD Fair-Rite #31 mix toro; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00207.html (25,039 bytes)
71. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:44:19 -0600; Hi Don, Thanks for the information. Those common mode chokes certainly are effective. Your experience would suggest that it is not just radiation emitting from the front of the screen that causes the; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00208.html (26,362 bytes)
72. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Ray, W4BYG" <w4byg@att.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:00:08 -0400; Just a comment about the prospective "load impedance" issue mentioned. It has been my experience that the utility power system for the house has a much lower source impedance than any portable invert; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00209.html (30,272 bytes)
73. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:43:03 -0400; Proactively having the government check everything does seem impractical, indeed. However, putting rules in place that oblige manufacturers and/or importers to replace faulty equipment at their expen; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00286.html (9,801 bytes)
74. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:50:47 -0400; An occasional spot check wouldn't bring world commerce to a halt! If an item fails and it's found that the mfr left out critical filtering components, the whole load goes back to China. On 3/29/2014; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00288.html (10,406 bytes)
75. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:33:25 -0600; How many people in how many locations will be needed to spot check all these items entering the country? Who exactly will be paying for this? The other problem is that the maker has no clue who is bu; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00289.html (11,615 bytes)
76. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 01:40:12 +0000; The unit we tested had the FCC logo on it, even though it was 58 dB over the noise limits. It also has a CE mark on it, and there are already complaints being brought in Europe. Under the US rules, t; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00290.html (11,538 bytes)
77. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:45:48 -0400; It appears to be a case of fraud & should be addressed by the appropriate Federal agencies (FCC, FEC, etc.). If enough people are harmed, directly or indirectly, a classaction lawsuit may also result; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00291.html (10,793 bytes)
78. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:46:14 -0700; I really like your idea of making the maker replace the equipment at their cost! That places the problem and cost with the creator of the issue int eh first place! Great idea! Consider this as an opt; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00293.html (11,425 bytes)
79. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 22:52:00 -0400 (GMT-04:00); Yes indeed. When I worked at at AST Research in the 1990's, we caught one firm shipping us unshielded laptop computers, and had we not tested one of the first, they would have insisted the contract b; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00294.html (9,467 bytes)
80. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:53:33 -0700; Mike, Respectfully no one is trying to flush out an entire process down to a budget level here-- but you, and then only to shoot down an idea... I think that the spot check idea is a fine idea... I a; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00295.html (12,536 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]