Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Another\s+possible\s+problem\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:15:08 -0700
So....I read in this morning's local rag that Pullman, Washington, 7 miles west of here, is part of a pilot program to have 150 of its street lights replaced with a "new prototype LED" unit, and is o
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00086.html (10,363 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:27:12 -0700
Remember that RF is radiated by current flowing on conductors. We call them antennas. :) To be a good antenna on the HF bands, a conductor must be fairly long. Most street lights are on metal poles,
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00087.html (10,707 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:48:06 -0500
That's the signal report. We've got LEDs on Main St but I'm not near enough to hear them even if they do make noise. Certainly they don't bother anything above 6 m in the car (if I remember, I'll see
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00088.html (9,844 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:52:48 -0700
I ain't worried about heat, Bill... Ken W7EKB _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00089.html (6,895 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:04:32 -0700
Oh, sure.....I hadn't thought of that... I don't much care about things above 6 meters....BELOW 6 meters is what is important to me/us....like down to 630 meters, in fact. Hmmm...maybe I'll check par
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00090.html (10,066 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: <n0tt1@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:41:52 +0000
Ken, If those LED were to be installed in my area, I would sure want firm assurance that the lighting system will be free of RFI. I'm sure there are other on this reflector that will want to expound
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00095.html (9,618 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:55:17 -0500
The Mall of America in Bloomington Minnesota has changed all their parking ramps to LED lighting. I've been there many times and have not noticed any increased interference to my mobile rig. Dale, k9
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00096.html (6,725 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:58:40 -0500
My REA replaced my "safety" yard light with an LED unit. Whiter, brighter, no noise. The vapor light made lots of noise on start up. This one does not. 73 and Good Luck. Joe kk0sd ___________________
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00097.html (11,108 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 23:06:54 -0500
Your REA? What is this? 1938? :-D My neighbor has one from our rural electric coop and so far, it's still vapor (of some sort - no idea if it's flavored). I had not thought of the coops replacing the
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00098.html (9,994 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 23:56:55 -0700
I was pretty suspicious when they put them in around my area. I noticed no increase in noise, even when driving around each lamp. The only one I did find noise on was a malfunctioning one that was f
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00099.html (9,329 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: CR <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:03:15 -0400
On 7/30/2014 6:41 PM, n0tt1@juno.com wrote: I would*suggest* a registered letter be sent to whoever is in charge and address your (and other local hams!) concerns regarding the possible RFI. Do get t
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00100.html (7,718 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:14:38 -0700
OK. Thank you, Kurt, and everyone else who responded. Although I am still wary, the stress level has been much reduced. Kenneth G. Gordon W7EKB "Courage is being scared to death but saddling up anywa
/archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00101.html (9,817 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] Another possible problem? (score: 1)
Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 23:02:50 -0700
"Although I am still wary, the stress level has been much reduced." I do a lot of weak signal stuff, so I was really concerned, I couldn't hear them parked under a light with a 10m 1/4 whip on 10m in
/archives//html/RFI/2014-08/msg00000.html (6,525 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu