Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Update\:\s+Tesla\'s\s+Response\s+to\s+Solar\s+Panel\s+RFI\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:20:08 -0500
All: I received the following updates from Tesla's Ms. Holmen regarding the RFI being caused by their solar panel installation. The good news is that she will be meeting with SolarEdge on Wednesday.
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00118.html (15,630 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:26:27 -0600
She still doesnt get it. Its not a zoning issue. I think you should also contact the FCC agent and speak with him directly to make sure its understood that youre a licensed amateur. Kim N5OP "People
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00119.html (15,549 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J via RFI" <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 21:59:35 +0000
She didn't understand because didn't talk to the right folks at the FCC. She spoke to their lawyers not enforcement. She needs to understand the neighbor may have a right to operate the solar equipme
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00120.html (17,500 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:04:24 -0800
"They did advise that a homeowner has the right to install solar on their home regardless of potential interference. I advised the agent on the line about the amateur license being help by the neighb
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00121.html (12,244 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 22:27:04 +0000
Being terribly facetious: Let's all fire up our spark transmitters connected to the best HF antenna we have. Would FCC then, act? Absolutely! How is solar much different? Don't need an old Ford spark
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00122.html (18,367 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 22:29:45 +0000
Next time I drive through DIA in Denver, I will have Pat (my wife) drive. I will be armed with an antenna, a laptop, and an AirSpy, or better yet, a portable spectrum anaylzer. There is a HUGE solar
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00123.html (19,896 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Dale Johnson <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:39:14 -0600
The person is a public relations worker and it's their job to deflect problems away from the company that they work for. Hire an attorney, explain the situation to the attorney and suggest they write
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00124.html (15,451 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:12:58 -0800
"Yes, the lawyers dont work cheap." Most give a free hour of consultation. A letter is typically $100. Kurt _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00126.html (10,446 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:55:54 +0000
Let me see if I can put this into perspective. First, there are a number of factors here that are not usually made part of the discussions about solar arrays that are being installed. The first is th
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00137.html (23,261 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Gary Smith <wa6fgi@steeltrails.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:00:57 -0800
To all: It was an entirely different issue with an adjoining county's board of s(t)upes, they were hemming and hawing with our r/c club over .01 cent things until I finally took the lead and had an
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00138.html (17,165 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 19:39:13 +0000
Actually, they have a right to operate it unless it causes actual interference. That is all that the letter Is trying to say. Like I said in my previous email, your station has the potential to cause
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00139.html (13,380 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:42:36 -0800
Thanks for your detailed summary of this. I have also contributed to this matter, consulting with Tefford Reed, the Solar Edge field tech who was working on K2MO's neighbor's installation. By coincid
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00140.html (11,631 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:01:14 -0800
"Let me see if I can put this into perspective. First, there are a number of factors here that are not usually made part of the discussions about solar arrays that are being installed. The first is t
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00143.html (10,438 bytes)

14. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:59:21 -0600
If there were, Im certain Ed would have mentioned it. Hes on our side! Kim N5OP "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith ___________
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00145.html (10,921 bytes)

15. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 02:02:37 +0000
Again, there are no FCC limits placed on *radiated emissions* below 30 MHz. Only limits on *conducted emissions* are in place by FCC for frequencies from 150 kHz through 29.99999999.......MHz. Since
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00146.html (11,874 bytes)

16. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 21:48:00 -0500
Ed: My case with SolarEgdge is the one that has not been resolved so I'd like to ask you a few questions and respond to the confusion regarding the RFI from my neighbors system continuing after it wa
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00147.html (25,087 bytes)

17. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 03:18:30 +0000
FCC needs to face this square in the face. *For HF*, nothing in the FCC rules, Part 15 included, presently applies to a typical solar installation. -- *Dave - WLEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* *Just Thin
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00148.html (29,251 bytes)

18. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: <r55stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 19:21:41 -0800
SolarEdge optimizers can make RFI covering most of the 20 meter band even when they are idling with the main inverter off, or before they are connected in a new system. The voltage on the input side
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00149.html (30,323 bytes)

19. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 03:31:35 +0000
How about forwarding a copy of that attorney letter to all of us so that we can modify as appropriate for local use? 73 de Mac, K2GKK/5 Since 30 Nov 1953 Oklahoma City, OK USAF, Retired ('61-'81) FAA
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00150.html (12,844 bytes)

20. Re: [RFI] Update: Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: AA5CT via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 03:41:45 +0000 (UTC)
There are specs and standards for radiated EMI as well as antenna equipment (eg as untuned pickup loops and active E-field probes) designed to develop standard 'gain' for HF measurement receivers use
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00151.html (30,615 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu