Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+80M\s+LOOP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+80M\s+LOOP\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 23:06:53 +0000; Rick, your observations generally agree with mine on NVIS antennas of any sort; whether dipole, inverted V, or loop, over very reflective ground. The experiment I observed used roughly 100,000 square; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00378.html (9,909 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion Aux I/O socket (score: 1): Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:39:49 -0600; When did you place your order? Just curious. I guess that I will query TenTec this week to see if they have a delivery date for mine, yet. 73 Bernard, WA4OEJ; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00393.html (9,133 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Pegasus with Winlink (score: 1): Author: Lynn Finch <lmfin@citlink.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 04:07:05 +0000; Since the Pegasus makes a great rig for RV?s and sailboats I am guessing that there are a number of Pegasus owners that make use of Winlink2000 airmail software. The airmail software outputs frequenc; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00403.html (6,996 bytes)
4. [TenTec] FS: Filters 216 & 288 (score: 1): Author: "George Skoubis" <george.skoubis@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 17:33:05 -0600; Hi, I'm selling two filters that I won't be able to use with the Orion I'm going to purchase. I'm asking $65.00 each, I'll take care of UPS (Stateside)... Model 216 500hz 6 pole RTTY filter for 9mhz; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00406.html (7,502 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] FS: Filters 216 & 288 (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:16:34 EST; I'm pretty sure you can use the 216 with Orion?? Lee; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00408.html (6,432 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1): Author: W9efl@aol.com; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:26:18 EST; Hello Paul!!!! Regarding 80m loops. I have two orthoganal 80m loops and an inv V for 80m. I was told by several DXr's that I needed an inv V and that it would outperform the loops. The V hasn't been; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00422.html (8,361 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:18:35 -0600; Admittingly, this is a great discussion, although not specifically Tentec related. I have 2 complete Tentec stations being a Paragon and an Omni VI+ on my property. Here's the antennas for the Tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00424.html (10,381 bytes)
8. RE: [TenTec] 80M LOOP (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:24:36 -0500; I came in late on this thread, so I don't know whether Rick is talking about horizontal or vertical loops. In either case, I think there's a reasonable explanation for the observation that loops outp; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00425.html (12,162 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1): Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:01:30 -0500; Having never had the good fortune to have tall antennas, I can verify (at least in my experience) that low dipoles for 40/80/160 are pretty much omni directional. I'll give you a for instance. I live; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00428.html (14,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]