Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+80m\s+antenna\s+suggestion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+80m\s+antenna\s+suggestion\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Re: Loop (score: 1): Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dennis.mcalpine@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:54:13 -0500; Funny thing you mentioned that. The next message I received was one from Feb. 10th from k2sx@arrl.net. Damn those echoes... 73, Dennis, K2SX arrl.net happened somewhere. bit old or; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00265.html (8,329 bytes)
2. [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: "Chris" <christopher_an@sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:57:15 -0500; Hi all, As spring comes close, I'd like to have a plan to put up a new 80m antenna but don't know which one to go for. I am currently using a Fritzel FD-4 low power version (300W CW) just above my ro; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00266.html (8,214 bytes)
3. [TenTec] FS: TT 238 Tuner (score: 1): Author: N0KHQ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:45:41 EST; Hello All, I have for sale a 9+ TT 238 Tuner. Light bulbs replaced, orange pointer, nylon string and elastic cord have also been replaced. Reason for sale: I have a TT 238B Asking $300.00 plus shippi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00269.html (7,129 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: ARDUJENSKI@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:47:20 EST; Chris You did not indicate physical restrictions or limitations you may have (property size, etc.) or what operating parameters you are setting for your self (local or DX or both). Note by defining y; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00270.html (11,195 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: N0KHQ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:55:17 EST; Please visit the web sites below. Based on the same principle as shown on the web site pages I will be manufacturing a fully rotatable 80/75m dipole with a turning radius of 16'. The weight of the an; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00271.html (9,676 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Mic for Argo 509 (score: 1): Author: Ynkedragon@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:12:51 EST; <<I'm looking for a good desk mike for my Argo 509 !!! I'm a DXer and contester and enjoy a bargain !!! >> The best mike I ever found for my Argosy was a Shure 444D. Worked well for both DX and 'esti; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00275.html (6,924 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:25:18 -0700; check the one in April QST ...jack ak7o Hi all, As spring comes close, I'd like to have a plan to put up a new 80m antenna but don't know which one to go for. I am currently using a Fritzel FD-4 low; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00276.html (8,865 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:41:22 -0600; Chris, I think that antenna is stainless steel conductor? You might homebrew a more efficient radiator of large gauge COPPER house wire, which is sold insulated but very reasonable at chain Home Cent; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00277.html (8,850 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Recommended Desk Mics for Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:53:11 -0600; I vote for the 706 desk mike. Hard to beat in terms of good quality SSB and punch. 73 Bob, K4TAX; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00290.html (8,787 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: "Chris" <christopher_an@sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:27:47 -0500; Hi Larry, Thank you for the reply. I am looking for an antenna for all purpose but mostly on DXing. I have a 48ft tower in my backyard and my lot size is 65x120, a typical small city lot. Thanks. Chr; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00291.html (9,696 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:11:05 -0600; I have found that if you have the room for a 1/2 wave dipole that the bazooka made of coax works very well, is quieter than a vertical or a open wire dipole and more broadbanded than either. Search f; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00292.html (11,023 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:30:20 -0600 (GMT-06:00); Chris, purchase yourself a copy of ON4UN's LowBand DXing book. It has TONS of ideas for you to consider for your limited space. Also, check out the article by N4KG in the May 1994 QST who describes; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00293.html (9,730 bytes)
13. [TenTec] "Apples and Oranges..." (score: 1): Author: "john, ke5c" <ke5c@hot.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:20:38 -0600; http://www.eham.net/articles/7680 (i was looking for 'orion' or 'tentec' in the title so took a bit of looking to find it.) - subjective experiences and a philosophic perspective rather than a hard,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00296.html (7,557 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:28:53 +0000; Chuckle - even back in prehistoric times we knew the only way to broadband a dipole is to make it lossy. However the reduction in field strength, while greater than a typical trap or loading inductor; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00297.html (10,423 bytes)
15. [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:34:43 -0800 (PST); I just went to check the reviews for the Orion on eHam. I was surprised to find that you can't read most of the reviews until you pay for a subscription. Maybe I'm wrong about this, but that's what i; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00299.html (8,450 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Recommended Desk Mics for Jupiter (score: 1): Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:55:19 -0500; Jason Buchanan wrote: edoc wrote: Is the TenTec Model 706 important for the Jupiter to shine or would most any mic sound OK? The 706 is perfect match - crisp and clean audio. 73 Jason N1SU The initia; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00305.html (8,133 bytes)
17. RE: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:28:37 -0600; Advertisers apparently didn't want to pay up for the bandwidth increases... This is a common difficulty with the hobby web sites... old addage, pick any of the following two, Good Fast Cheap Works ev; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00315.html (9,569 bytes)
18. RE: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:41:26 -0600; Well, For me, E-mails to eham's people have been responded to, Changed my call sign and they handled it just fine. They even transferred the flag that said I was a subscriber... But there may be some; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00330.html (10,000 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1): Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:38:15 -0500; Content is why 'consumers' subscribe to ISP's. ISPs would benefit from a tiered pricing structure. Business customers pay for guaranteed bandwidth. Content providers(who don't charge) i.e. mailing li; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00337.html (9,830 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:53:03 -0600; A great resource for multiple antenna ideas is the L. B. Cebik, W4RNL, antenna web site at www.cebik.com GL and 73, Stuart K5KVH; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00338.html (9,324 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]