Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Antenna\s+Analyzers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Antenna\s+Analyzers\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Antenna Analyzers (score: 1): Author: kw0d@netexpress.net (Dave Kamp, KW0D); Date: Thu Jul 3 21:34:21 2003; Hi Vince! I have the predecessor to the MFJ-269... I've got the 259B. It's a fine tool, but like any tool, one must understand how it does what it does, in order to make it most accurate and useful.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00119.html (8,509 bytes)
22. [TenTec] Antenna Analyzers (score: 1): Author: vern@mantlelamp.com (Vern Kunes); Date: Thu Jul 3 21:40:20 2003; Have to agree that the MFJ is capable. A friend and myself split the cost of a 259 many years ago, and has served us well. Vern -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Kamp, KW0D" <kw0d@netexpress.net> To; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00123.html (9,416 bytes)
23. [TenTec] Antenna Analyzers (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Thu Jul 3 22:44:26 2003; No one has mentioned the AEA analyzers... how 'bout some feedback on them? - jgc John Clifford KD7KGX Heathkit HW-9 WARC/HFT-9/HM-9 Elecraft K2 #1678 /KSB2/KIO2/KBT2/KAT2/KNB2/KAF2/KPA100 Ten-Tec Omn; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00125.html (7,778 bytes)
24. [TenTec] Antenna Analyzers (score: 1): Author: k4aal@comcast.net (Ariel M. Elam); Date: Thu Jul 3 22:57:01 2003; Mine is a MFJ 249. Yes, it's OLD. It works for me. I use it with a wall wart. Cliff is 100%. 73, Ariel, k4aal; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00126.html (8,829 bytes)
25. [TenTec] Antenna Analyzers (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Thu Jul 3 23:20:01 2003; Used the CIA-HF since 1998 and wouldn't be without it. Only one that plots the data and has an oscillator accurate to within 200 Hz of dial setting and stays put. Currently selling for $600 but worth; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00127.html (8,829 bytes)
26. [TenTec] Antenna Analyzers (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sun Jul 6 21:36:59 2003; "My first choice was the MFJ 269 but, after some research I wonder about the Autek VA-1. I will appreciate any and all comments or suggestions for another choice." == I have both the MFJ-259 and the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00204.html (8,935 bytes)
27. [TenTec] Antenna Analyzers (score: 1): Author: K7YX@comcast.net (Reid Simmons); Date: Sun Jul 6 21:37:13 2003; Vic; I have had the Autek RF-1 for about 7 years and love it. I carefully researched what was available back then and chose the Autek based on size, performance, features, and quality relative to it'; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00207.html (9,199 bytes)
28. [TenTec] Antenna Analyzers (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre); Date: Mon Jul 7 15:20:01 2003; I have the older Autek RF -1 and the MFJ 269. The 269 has the 440 and 2m as well as HF, but is heavy and certainly a bit unwieldy to use on a tower. The Autek HF and VHF models are shirt pocket sized; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00228.html (9,143 bytes)
29. [TenTec] Antenna Analyzers (score: 1): Author: wb2vuf@qsl.net (Bwana Bob); Date: Tue Jul 29 20:55:56 2003; Vin: I have the Autek RF-1 and I really like it. I use it for tuning my fixed station and mobile antennas, presetting antenna tuners, and making loading coils. Before I got it, antenna experiments we; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00748.html (8,884 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]