Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s+Comparison\s*$/: 52 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Modern version of the Tec Tec Corsair - please, Ten Tec! (score: 1)
Author: John Farler <k4avx1@windstream.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:30:03 -0400
Ok on the if structure of the Corsair. I don't have an original paper manual, just a download, so I'm going to print it and take another gander at every thing, since it's now my backup that I'll use
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-10/msg00033.html (8,938 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:12:40 +0000
Frank, Efficiency was calculated, knowing that Rrad should be 5 Ohms. So for example with just the ground rod, efficiency = 5/33 = 15.15% 73, Steve G3TXQ Frank
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00089.html (10,189 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Eagle comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Paul DeWitte" <k9ot@yousq.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 10:00:39 -0600
The Eagle has been out for a little while now. For those of you that have one or had access to one, how would you rate it compared to an OmniV or OmniVI? How about an Orion? A used Orion and the Eagl
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00090.html (8,470 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Eagle comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 10:45:54 -0600
My Eagle has an external RX jack. For any of us to make a meaningful comparison, I guess you need to specify what you want to do with the radio. Casual user? Contester? DXer? CW? SSB? Both? Fixed? Po
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00091.html (10,351 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Zivney, Terry L." <00tlzivney@bsu.edu>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 12:08:58 -0500
I was looking at the Eagle as a possible substitute for my Omni VI+ for a backup radio for my two Orions. I know TenTec has posted a mod to add an external receiver antenna for the Eagle. But, for my
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00092.html (9,252 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:25:12 +0000 (UTC)
Terry, I'm glad it's not just me. The remote tuning knob is the single reason that my next rig will be an Omni VII, rather than an Eagle. Seems trite, but my rigs are on a shelf, 8" above the desk to
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00093.html (10,398 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 11:29:30 -0600
Come on Dave... it's easy to part with an OMNI VI+..... I've done it four or five times! (always bought another one not long after that) HOWEVER, I can tell you that I would not trade my Eagle for 2
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00094.html (11,280 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:34:00 +0000
By early 2004, N1MM Logger was doing amazing tricks with the Orion. Tom N1MM had an Orion and I was involved in spec'ing the SO2V implementation. To this day, N1MM can do things with the Orion that a
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00095.html (8,911 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Henderson" <wb9hla@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:00:45 -0500
I too stopped by the factory over Thanksgiving and tried the Eagle out and I too was impressed with the radio. It is a good radio but I think it is about $500.00 to high. Love my OrionII and my Jupit
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00099.html (10,747 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Titan 425 3CPX800A7 Modification (score: 1)
Author: "Jason Cooper" <jbear45@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:28:20 -0800
I believe that this is the web page that has that modification. http://www.hamradiomarket.com/articles/Titan%20P%20Hybrid.htm<http://www.hamradiomarket.com/articles/Titan%20P%20Hybrid.htm> 73, Jason
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00138.html (13,021 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Titan 425 3CPX800A7 Modification (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:09:12 -0800
Yep...that's it! Ron N6IE www.N6IE.com -- Original Message -- From: "Jason Cooper" <jbear45@msn.com> To: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent:
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00141.html (13,858 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] [TenTec_Eagle] (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:31:42 -0600
Sorted by dynamic range, Narrow spaced, the Eagle is 14 receivers higher then the Corsair. (There was no note saying Corsair I or II.) -Stuart Rohre K5KVH
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00169.html (7,396 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Corsair II speaker replacement (score: 1)
Author: Don Rasmussen <wb8yqj@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:55:05 -0800 (PST)
Anyone know where I can find an oval speaker - looks like about 4 inches by 2.75 inches that mounts on the bottom cover of Corsair II? How many times have I ripped the leads of one of these speakers
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00171.html (6,851 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] [TenTec_Eagle] (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:36:38 -0500
Not yet, but if you'll be kind enough to buy me an Eagle, I'll gladly do the comparison for you. Has anyone done a comparison between the Eagle and the Corsair II? Are there any comments about their
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00173.html (7,993 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Need Corsair Part (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Chambley Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:29:35 -0500
Gentlemen: I am in need of the counter chip MK50938N, for the Corsair display. I think this chip might also have been used in some of the earlier T/T rigs. If noone has the chip, I'd be willing to bu
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00175.html (7,757 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
Author: Joe Roberts <jroberts@io.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:44:19 -0500
Yeah, really! here is more to life than 2kc Dynamic Range!! What about the "Sweetness Factor"?...we KNOW the Corsairs and Omni V are SWEET rigs! I'd hesitate to give either one up for anything not ye
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00176.html (10,329 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Need Corsair Part (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:47:56 -0600
Don't have one. The major search engines no longer admit such a part, not even from the Chinese repositories of ancient and obsolete parts. I do have a data sheet in this computer however, and it loo
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00178.html (8,763 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:18:47 +0000
Has anybody successfully installed the Inrad roofing filter mod in the Corsair? My main knock on the Corsair is the AGC circuit - wish there was a major surgical mod for it . . . . 73, Barry N1EU
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00179.html (9,778 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] was OT: Indoor Antenna: re B&W type terminated dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 03:58:44 -0800 (PST)
Any antenna for that matter looses 1/2 their power or more when operated on a band that it is not designed for. Efficiency for a folded dipole has a factor of around 0.98 Efficiency for the common di
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00181.html (11,088 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
Author: kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:19:00 -0500 (EST)
Selecting a TXCVR s MUCH more difficult than that web page...Even though it is very hepful. Features, ergos, just plain do you really enjoy using it...are very important. I would want to try a Eagle
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00182.html (11,000 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu