Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Eagle\s+vs\.\s+TS\-590S\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] On Noisy Transmitters (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:26:39 +0200
YES, absolutely! The 6000 appears to be much better than all previous FLEX radios. But now maybe you understand why I was very skeptical about the 6000. And, Rob even described the 5000 as "BDR sinki
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00135.html (30,154 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: G Reichow <wa0yle12@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 10:16:02 -0500
Hello all, I am in the market for a new radio. Originally I was looking at the FTDX-1200 and the TS-590S as both of those are within my budget. Now, with the mega-sale, the Eagle is within my budget
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00136.html (8,213 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: Toby Pennington <w4cakk@centurylink.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:21:34 -0400
So, you have come to the Ten Tec list for an independent, impartial, report. HMMM! Toby K4NH On 7/6/2014 11:16 AM, G Reichow wrote: Hello all, I am in the market for a new radio. Originally I was loo
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00137.html (8,927 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 17:33:21 +0200
The Eagle has a slightly better receiver, especially on the higher bands. The ergonomics of the Kenwood are more typical of what most people are familiar with. Unfortunately Omnirig does not support
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00138.html (11,448 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: Clayton Brantley via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 08:30:17 -0700
I would take the Eagle over any Kenwood! Clayton N4EV So, you have come to the Ten Tec list for an independent, impartial,  report.    HMMM!    Toby K4NH _____________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00139.html (9,698 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 17:38:08 +0200
I would definitely take the TS-990 over the Eagle. But that's just about the only radio I would take. Well, maybe a PT-8000 too! 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) I would take the Eagle over a
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00140.html (10,415 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Let's talk "about" the radios: Scout (score: 1)
Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 13:20:11 -0400
Rick, I cant confirm that one, but I can tell you that there are two versions of finals for the scout. one pcb used bipolar devices and the other one FETs. Neither one is exceptionally hard to get to
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00142.html (8,859 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: JB Edmonds <n4nqy@jbedmonds.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:27:19 -0400
I think the Kenwood and Eagle are a toss up.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00143.html (9,923 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: Toby Pennington <w4cakk@centurylink.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:42:36 -0400
Well, perhaps I was too judgemental, you guys are offering pretty good advice.. If the user interface on the 590 is much better than the Eagle, I would go with the 590 other things being equal. Toby
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00144.html (10,562 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: Mike Schatzberg <cherokeehillfarm@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 14:09:02 -0400
I have enjoyed the 590 both in my station with a large monoband array, and portable with a fan dipole. The receiver is simply amazing in every aspect. The human interface is simply superb and offers
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00145.html (12,766 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] FS: Ten-Tec Orion 565 AT (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 19:01:43 +0000
Penultimate relative to Orion II seems to make this appropriate phrasing ;-) All this will change of course with the next ultimate rig from Ten-Tec. But a used 565 or 566 will always be an ultimate b
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00148.html (8,282 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] FS: Ten-Tec Orion 565 AT (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 17:03:44 -0400
OK... I get that. Good take, Barry. --JR --
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00154.html (7,511 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] On Noisy Transmitters (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 00:10:35 +0200
True, but for the OM7, you can adjust the rise time and obtain some really wonderful keying. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) Another point I forgot to make in this post is that many modern r
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00157.html (11,045 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: Mike Schatzberg <cherokeehillfarm@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 18:10:11 -0400
Sorry but Kenwood does not charge at their service centers on the east or west coast here in the USA. Mike W2AJI Sent from my iPhone
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00158.html (15,477 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 00:18:21 +0200
Well they certainly do here in Europe! Consider yourself lucky. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) Sorry but Kenwood does not charge at their service centers on the east or west coast here in t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00159.html (16,060 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] On Noisy Transmitters (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 15:50:19 -0700
Would you publish this list?
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00163.html (9,679 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 17:51:44 -0500
One thing to consider: atthe stated prices, you could buy and Eagle and try it out. If you find the ergonomics truly distasteful, you could probably turn around and sell it (after the end of July) fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00164.html (14,140 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] On Noisy Transmitters (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 19:17:17 -0400
That's normal for Icom. Actually a little clicking helps attract attention in contests. Best regards - Bry Carling
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00167.html (11,900 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] On Noisy Transmitters (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 19:38:38 -0400
I put little stock in one test at one site by one group of guys on early production units. I know there are loads of 590s in service in contest group shacks and have been used happily on many FD site
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00169.html (11,747 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 19:39:46 -0400
I wouldn't go that far. I don't know about EU, but I do know that in the US at one time, someone had to have been in busy for at least a year and be doing a minimum dollar value of retail business be
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00170.html (12,256 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu