No need to reinvent the wheel! If you are genuinely concerned about CW as a mode and would like to have a forum to express your feelings/concerns, perhaps you should join one of the already establish
Or this one: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/brasspounders 73, Jim KM5M -- We don't stop playing because we get old, we get old because we stop playing. (George Bernard Shaw) http://mailman.qth.net/mai
Oh definitely, the basic math skills are needed, I just said the slide rule does not have to be taught, for one to learn to work basic math on the calculator. You can make errors with either, if your
I too am getting tired of the postings about CW on this list. As suggested several times, discussions about CW should occur on those lists dedicated to the "care and feeding" of CW users. Let them pr
Yes, I know. That may well be. And I wouldn't posit otherwise. So even after it was redesigned to his spec, it's still "noisy". All I intended to do in my post was to ask the standard question of a
Turn your rig on! Listen...better yet, call CQ! Spend some of the wasted bandwidth on the reflector and get on the air. Populate the ether with RF. Try a new band. There is lot's of good DX out there
W0EWM: NQ5T: redesigned to his spec, it's still "noisy". With all due respect to Rob, it was ARRL that first discovered the IMD problem with the 500 Hz filter. It was my initiation of the Inrad #352
I have the same issue and it IS the filter in my case. 217 filter. Replacement filter solves issue. Does anyone know the capacitor values on the board as mine are not marked? Thank you for any advice
Hello All, I've noticed the same WRT the AGC attack time too. I like Ron's list. I would also suggest getting the RFI out of the rear speaker output as well as the key jack. I have a 1 foot cable bet