Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+License\s+Renewal\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+License\s+Renewal\.\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] James (score: 1): Author: "donhall161" <donhall161@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:27:02 -0500; Bob, Thanks for saying what a lot of us have been thinking. After 66 years as a ham(62 as an Extra), First phone, Registered Professional Engineer, BS, MS and PhD course work in EE, I tire of instant; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00710.html (9,143 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:21:55 -0700; No bluffs. Product reviews that can be downloaded from the ARRL website. May 2011 QST page 47, Fig 1 for the TS-590S Jan 2009 QST page nr doesn't show Fig 3 of the K3 review. Aug 2011 QST page 45 Fig; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00714.html (10,776 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] License Renewal. (score: 1): Author: "R. Eric Sluder via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:51:07 -0400; I renewed in March and mine was the usual buff official looking paper. Eric W9WLW Sent from my iPhone; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00715.html (8,212 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] License Renewal. (score: 1): Author: Froiseth Richard <Rfwd6dok@centurylink.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:59:05 -0600; Eric, Thanks for responding. I guess I need to contact the FCC. 73s Rich, WD6DOK; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00716.html (8,965 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: john <johnmb@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:04:06 -0400; " What other radio manufacturer ever communicates directly with a user group and finds out their needs?" Well... Elecraft, for many years. 73 John K5MO -- This email is free from viruses and malware; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00718.html (8,688 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]