Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\+\s+AUDIO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\+\s+AUDIO\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] looking for a ten tec 301 remote encoder (score: 1): Author: Bill Shekooley <shekool@shaw.ca>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:12:55 -0600; Have 301 complete unit also pieces from ten tec to build one. VE6BCS; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00249.html (6,947 bytes)
2. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ AUDIO (score: 1): Author: "yash@aol.com" <yash@aol.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:21:42 -0400 (EDT); Two questions,have a new to me ,OMNI VI+ , one of the earlier rigs ,no SM components. Iam using the rig with the matching supply/speaker. Iam not too happy with the audio from the speaker or even wit; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00250.html (7,854 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ AUDIO (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:30:39 +0000; The Omni6 ssb rx audio always goes through the dsp circuit which steeply rolls off all audio below 260hz. No matter what you do, you're not going to get much low freq ssb rx audio out of the Omni6 re; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00251.html (8,782 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ AUDIO (score: 1): Author: Dennis R Baumgarte <ae2ee@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:51:38 -0400; On 09/17/2012 10:21, yash@aol.com wrote: Two questions,have a new to me ,OMNI VI+ , one of the earlier rigs ,no SM components. Iam using the rig with the matching supply/speaker. Iam not too happy wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00252.html (8,656 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ AUDIO (score: 1): Author: John Oglesby <john91@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:55:41 -0400; A couple of thoughts. First, the later VI's do have some surface mount boards. Second, the internal speaker is lousy and can be buzzy. Same issue for the PS speaker. I use the roofing filters for CW; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00253.html (8,804 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ AUDIO (score: 1): Author: Donnie <cfzepp@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:53:58 -0400; Hi Dale: Before you do anything else, first try using a low cost MFJ-281 Clear Tone speaker on your Omni 6+. It will be the BEST $15 bucks you have ever spent to help obtain nice crisp Rx audio out o; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00254.html (9,443 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] O II Menu (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:09:48 -0500; No, you are thinking the right way. You don't want it where you don't know how it might affect what it hits - long term or short term! (That's why I use the needle applicator.) 73, Duane Duane Calvin; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00290.html (8,737 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Finally got a Omni-VI+ (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 07:31:12 -0400; Nah....Someone may have found a newer FET or other that offers a higher gain/ lower noise to swap out with the original. To come up with a circuit board to do an upgrade on an obsolete unit does not; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00106.html (9,702 bytes)
9. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:27:47 -0400; ". . . even on SSB it is fine, no pinched SSB here, sounds very nice to me." Me too. I don't understand why the INRAD audio mod was/is needed. 73, John, W3ULS; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00107.html (7,627 bytes)
10. [TenTec] 285 Filter (score: 1): Author: "K5PX" <K5PX@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:13:27 -0500; I currently have a 285 filter for sale. $65.00 shipped in the US Bruce, K5PX; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00109.html (6,475 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Finally got a Omni-VI+ (score: 1): Author: "Tony Martin W4FOA" <w4foa@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:01:53 -0500; All I have to say is that I sure do love my "obsolete" Omni V+! But of course I would be interested in anything that would give me even a little more advantage on the receive or transmit side. 73 to; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00111.html (10,807 bytes)
12. RE: [TenTec] Omni V S-meter? (score: 1): Author: "Rick Williams" <rick.williams@telus.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:51:23 -0700; Well I think the consensus is don't sweat the small stuff. The Omni V.9 is definitely working well otherwise and, as expected, it is certainly far superior to the RX-320 and marginally better on weak; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00116.html (7,437 bytes)
13. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:16:05 -0700 (PDT); The Omni VI+ receive audio bandwith is limited to 1600hz or so because of internal passive components (capacitors) and the audio signal passing through the notch filter and DSP ICs regardless of whet; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00117.html (8,333 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:34:03 -0400; Same with this--after a week or two of hearing all the high and low frequencies in addition to the mid-range you won't want to go back to < 2.8 KHz. Rob, I guess I'm missing something. It would seem; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00118.html (8,493 bytes)
15. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:28:28 -0700 (PDT); In terms of what K5UJ and K8VT are discussing: one rig's "2.8Khz" receive selectivity is not equal to another's. There is an unbelievable difference between the Orion and Omni VI+ in this regard when; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00119.html (8,122 bytes)
16. [TenTec] RE: OMNI VI+ Audio (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:45:40 -0400; ". . .when someone always set the PBT and the Notch "straight up," turned the mike gain to max, and then complained about the audio and the splatter reports he got. FWIW, the very worst offenders wer; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00125.html (7,576 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Finally got a Omni VI+ now I need a CW Elmer (score: 1): Author: "ke4vpn" <ke4vpn@carolina.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:08:49 -0400; Hello again, Well after getting the Omni VI+ figured out this past weekend, and finally getting brave enough to get on cw once again, I find I need some cw help. I can not blame it on the rig anymore; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00128.html (9,446 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]