Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+filters\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni5 mic gain (score: 1)
Author: gary mankoff <garyjm88@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 17:28:17 -0700
Hello everyone Is there an internal mic gain adjustment on the tx board in my Omni 5 73 Sent from my iPad
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00008.html (6,379 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 21:12:03 -0500
Hi everyone, After adjusting the BFO and TCXO and using the Omni VI for SSB and digital modes for a little over a week now, I kind of like the new to me rig. I noticed a +2 or so S unit change when s
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00009.html (8,132 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Dukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 21:21:24 -0500
Your 2.4 KHz filter COULD be bad but most likely the gain select is set for a CW filter. The optional filter slots have a jumper select for added gain when a CW filter is enabled, to compensate for i
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00010.html (9,101 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 21:31:48 -0500
Gary Hi Gary, I doubt the 2.4 Kc or .5 Kc filters are bad. I have another 1.8 Kc and .5 Kc filter. Same results with either filters. I'll check the jumper. Thanks 73 Stan KM4HQE
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00011.html (8,612 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Dukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 22:13:09 -0500
The jumper is the most likely root cause Gary
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00012.html (9,371 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <kenradiobrown@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 17:58:17 -1000
It all depends on a lot of things. For one thing there are filter loss compensation jumpers in the Omni VI, but I think those are only for the 9 MHz filters, not for the 6.3 MHz IF filters. The other
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00013.html (10,656 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 00:34:22 -0500
The other thing that really matters is the spectral distribution of the noise and signal power within the filter bandpass. For example if the power of the noise or the signal is distributed uniforml
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00014.html (9,293 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <kenradiobrown@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:08:35 -1000
It is unclear to me whether you are talking about the NAR or N1, N2 filters in the 9 MHz IF or the Filters in the 6.3 MHz Pass Band Tuning IF. In either case there is something not quite right. If th
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00015.html (11,346 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Greg S <oldlongbeard@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 11:25:47 +0000 (UTC)
Stan....my Omni VI Plus has the same action as yours. When I hit the 1.8 button, signal narrows, and gain jumps noticeably. I've actually come to like it. I have hearing loss, and on past rigs, narro
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00016.html (9,893 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: s_gammons@charter.net
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 06:41:20 -0500
Hi Greg, I have hearing loss also. The increase in gain is fine with me. I just wondered if it was normal. Thanks for your reply. 73 Stan KM4HQE On Aug 7, 2017, 6:26 AM -0500, Greg S via TenTec <tent
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00017.html (10,873 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 08:12:58 -0400
It is not normal. Barry N1EU
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00018.html (11,707 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: John King <k5pgw@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:11:06 +0000 (UTC)
It is not normal. Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00019.html (12,282 bytes)

13. [TenTec] filter for sale/trade (score: 1)
Author: Ralph Matheny <mathenyr@marietta.edu>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:26:55 +0000
I have a 600hz Inrad filter for the Orion and other TT radios....a I could use an Inrad SSB 9 meg filter for my Omni V, or I'd sell the filter I have for $75 shipped USA. email: mathenyr@marietta dot
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00021.html (6,788 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:28:43 -0500
Hi John, No. I'd have to make one and send off list. The last photo I tried to send was too large and the message got tossed. If you have a manual, the variable capacitor C-31 shown the picture of th
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00022.html (12,902 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:34:25 -0500
Hi Barry, Ok. It's probably a PIN diode problem like Ken said in another post. I'll check those. Seems odd that the 2.4 Kc filter and the 500 Hz filter are both a couple S units lower output than the
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00023.html (11,896 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 22:02:32 +0000
I don't see how a PIN diode is going to result in abnormally high output. What would be a very interesting experiment is to pull all the 6.3MHz i.f. filters and simply jumper the in/out filter slot p
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00024.html (14,111 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:33:03 -0500
The 1.8 Kc filter has higher output than the 2.4 Kc or 500 Hz filters. That's why I was wondering if the PIN diodes for the 2.4 Kc and 500 Hz positions might be the problem. Would seem odd if that's
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00025.html (9,919 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 00:05:26 +0000
Are the 9 Mc filters in or jumpered with the correct jumpers for output? Gary - AB9M ________________________________ From: TenTec <tentec-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of Stan Gammons <s_gammons
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00026.html (10,624 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1)
Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 19:24:59 -0500
Gary - AB9M Hi Gary, It has a 9 Mhz filter installed in the standard position. Best I recall it's a 2.4 Kc filter and I believe the gain jumper is on the 2 pins close to the center of the radio. Ther
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00027.html (8,920 bytes)

20. [TenTec] New Ten Tec owner ... Omni C (score: 1)
Author: "bob tadlock" <res0tsxi@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:37:18 -0700
Hello Everybody, Well , I guess I finally joined the Ten Tec club . I purchased a very nice Omni C setup 3 weeks ago and I've been having a ball with it . I am really pleased how quiet the receiver i
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00262.html (8,112 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu