Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+$Original$\s+Battery\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+$Original$\s+Battery\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:27:11 -0600; Unfortunately the audio envelope isn't the RF envelope and severely clipped audio results in peakier RF than unprocessed audio. Gives it a splatter characteristic, so saith the book on SSB by Collins; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00632.html (9,202 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:30:08 -0400; They had pc's in 1958 ? Interesting. I was still using mainframes and terminals in 72....shows how much I missed.; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00637.html (9,311 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:32:12 -0600; Not really PCs. Tended to take up a whole room or building, and tended to have lots of noise from the card readers. I don't know of any analogue inputs in real time. But speech clippers were tried an; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00645.html (9,927 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Vertical radial question (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:20:15 -0500; If you have excellent ground conductivity, then the radials are not very important how they are oriented. But with poor ground conductivity (the normal situation), the vertical will radiate best in t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00665.html (9,610 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]