Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RADIO\s+COMPARISONS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RADIO\s+COMPARISONS\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] A real post and question (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:21:32 +0200; John, A couple of questions: 1. Do you plan to work CW or only SSB? 2. If CW, will you use it with your Hercules or some other amplifier? 3. If another amplifier, which make and model (due to relay s; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00744.html (11,372 bytes)
2. [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1): Author: <w4wst@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:28:03 -0400; Seems strange to me but every time I get on the web site there is a pissing contest going on about which rig does what better than a TENTEC. If you want to preach the virtues of a K-3 or a TS-590s, w; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00745.html (8,502 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1): Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:38:31 -0500; Hams have some unusual personality traits but this behavior is not unique to hams. Those who like cars, tubas, tools, stereos, firearms, kitchen appliances, toothbrushes, pets, razor blades, deodoran; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00746.html (9,742 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:40:05 +0200; Harry, I think you were a bit harsh on the TS-990. After all, it would make a good boat anchor! ;-) 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) Seems strange to me but every time I get on the web site t; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00747.html (10,094 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] A real post and question (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:15:23 -0400; boys and girls, Ive been selling the AmpKeyer for the last ten years or so. The AmpKeyer uses either (or both) mosfet and relay. The switch time for the relay is 5ms 2ms for the mosfet. It will switc; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00751.html (14,288 bytes)
6. [TenTec] WIN-TEST OmniRig Orion (score: 1): Author: John Henry <jhenry@tentec.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:55:35 -0400; Well, that couldn't have been any easier, I downloaded Win-Test, omnirig, and configured it for an Orion, and have that part working. Now, if anyone has any specific issues with the Orion ini file, p; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00755.html (7,922 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:54:28 -0400; Nice post, JB. As Rick mentioned, I read the ANTENNA BOOK cover to cover, and I read the ARRL Handbook on Radio Communications cover to cover, doing that with the The ARRL Handbook a slice a day. It; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00758.html (9,387 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Phase Noise Data Plotted to 1 MHz (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 16:32:36 -0500; Nicely done, Jim. Since I have an O II, I looked at that one first. I see the O II shows the lowest phase noise out to about 2.5 kHz, where it matched the K3, then heads the wrong way. It's #2 to abo; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00768.html (11,510 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:15:42 -0400; John, If the CAT program sends a BW of zero, that puts control back to the pot. I do that in my N4PY Orion program. So each BW change, I follow it with a zero BW. So can you make the BW command actua; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00774.html (11,153 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Where is TEN-TEC today? (score: 1): Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:38:07 -0400; Will the big sale be annual? If so, I'll start saving my paper route money now for next year!! ....Dave On 7/27/14, 6:15 PM, John Henry wrote: We are working, designing new products, recovering from; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00777.html (12,929 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY (score: 1): Author: "R. Eric Sluder via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:36:02 -0400; Some of the older handbooks cover topics such as modulation much better. It's always good to keep a few around your reading room. 73 - Eric W9WLW Sent from my iPhone; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00791.html (10,103 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Old timers... (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:41:47 -0400; I had the pleasure of meeting Al Kahn and Jack Burchfield 15-17 years ago in person at a semi-private ham get together in southwest Michigan...; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00793.html (7,212 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:32:31 -0400; He switched because... while Gibson plays better, Fender pays better. I am still waiting for my first royalty check from Guild or Martin ... :-( Guild Manhattan 170 (custom built Westerly) Martin D16; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00794.html (9,045 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:18:44 -0400; We had thunderstorms...right before the 3 M TT net. ;-( == I'll get on the air today with my 'ol TS520S, and have some fun!!" ______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00799.html (9,710 bytes)
15. [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1): Author: Spencer <k5gak@powerc.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:21:16 -0600; I've been a ham for a long time and I like my TEN-TEC radios, OMNI VII and CORSAIR. I also own a ICOM IC-7000, nice radio but too complicated. Don't like it. A guy told me a long time ago that he tho; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00800.html (8,138 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:30:59 -0700; As any comparative study of ARRL Lab tests will show (what I've done so far was less than 16 hours of my time), specifications of modern radio gear are almost completely meaningless. A manufacturer's; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00801.html (10,172 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY - for Billy (score: 1): Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:08:23 +0200; The usual practice is this: * TX on, say, 14 MHz, transmits through a 14 MHz bandpass filter, which attenuates the TX noise on 21 MHz. * RX on, say, 21 MHz, receives through a 21 MHz bandpass filter,; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00810.html (8,680 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1): Author: Richard Tschur <richard.tschur@schieb.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:55:34 +1000; Harry, I could not agree more with you!! Thank you Richard VK3KVK On 28/07/14 02:28, w4wst@cox.net wrote: Seems strange to me but every time I get on the web site there is a pissing contest going on; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00811.html (10,401 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Found - more readible versions of Ten Tec Corsair signal block diagram and main chassis wiring diagram (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ireland" <vk6vz@arach.net.au>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 22:18:45 +0800; Gday After some searching around, I found higher resolution versions of the Ten Tec Corsair II diagrams in a version of the manual on the mods.dk website. Hopefully this information may help other Co; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00822.html (7,748 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] BW and Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 18:26:37 +0200; John, First, when you speak of the Eagle INI file, are you referring to the file you have created? I have never seen an Eagle file in OmniRig. I have never changed anything in the INI file. I have al; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00833.html (11,839 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]