Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Solid\s+State\s+Amps\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten Tec Radios for sale (score: 1)
Author: "LDG Electronics" <ldg@ldgelectronics.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:21:56 -0400
Thanks to those that responded. The Orion and Pegasus units are sold. Dwayne Kincaid working and good physical condition. Please contact me off list for shipping or other details. I normally use UPS
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00494.html (7,837 bytes)

2. [TenTec] FS: Very Nice Delta 580 (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 19:39:50 EDT
Gang, I have a very nice Delta 580 FS. This one is fully WARC-enabled, has a very nice smooth PTO, and a very hot receiver. As you know, the 580 and Argosy radios are cosmetically challenged, it is v
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00498.html (6,975 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Looking for model 244 Digital Readout (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 18:01:24 -0700
Looking for a model 244 Digital Display unit for the Triton IV (Model 540). Working preferred. Cosmetically nice or restorable. What do you have and what do you want? I prefer using PayPal for paymen
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00500.html (7,332 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Wes Attaway (N5WA)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:28:03 -0500
I think the no-tune amps make a lot of sense for SO2R and other multi-radio and multi-band contesters. Outside of that application a no-tune amp is just "nice" but not really essential. Lots of peopl
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00501.html (9,904 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:02:12 -0700
That is very much the way it is. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00548.html (10,422 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Orion I or II, and Dxbase 2006 (score: 1)
Author: "RM" <royalct@inr.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:57:49 -0400
Since I help tested Dxbase and wrote a good chunk of the original Orion control script, I hope that the below information will help those that are interfacing Dxbase 2006 with either an Orion I or an
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00568.html (9,756 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Fwd: Is Orion really worth it? Given thepublishedproblems? (score: 1)
Author: "ROBERT CARROLL" <w2wg@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:08:37 -0400
A while back I spoke to Alpha about ALC in connection with some Yaesu issues (thump and loss of ALC control in an early MP--Yaesu issued a fix). They strongly recommended not using an ALC loop unless
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00583.html (10,343 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] What version? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Menzel" <retire@means.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:36:11 -0500
I am running 1.373b5 with my Orion, and it is still very stable after weeks and weeks of use, seems to operate smoothly, has good dsp/filter relationships and, at least to my ear, works qsk better th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00592.html (9,479 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Fwd: Is Orion really worth it? Given thepublished problems? (score: 1)
Author: William Addams <wiladdamsham@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
This has been a very informative day. Since I posted this, I have, of course, received the posted replies to the board. I have also received 148 different emails directly to my email address. Respons
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00596.html (16,530 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] call sign software radio control softwae (score: 1)
Author: "Dudley Hurry" <jhurry@austin.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 21:39:45 -0600
John, I was going to make a comment to you on the 20 meter net, but I can do it here... I have been using both the N4PY SW and the HamStation by WA1EYP since Mike had it as a free beta.. Both are ver
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00256.html (9,205 bytes)

11. [TenTec] TT filters wanted (9MHz)...swap: (score: 1)
Author: Dave Perrin <dbp@tds.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:53:03 -0500
HiI am in search of one or more 9 MHz filters for an OMNI V or VI etc. Model 217, 218 and 219. To swap towards that end I can offer any of: -Ten Tec 228 200 watt antenna tuner, -Norcal 38 special 30
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00258.html (6,861 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Ken & Linda Burrough" <w8keb@1st.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:41:42 -0500
If the amp is NOT type accepted and comes from a manufacture then they are not illegal to us in the USA. If they can take a four watts input and put 500 watts to an antenna they are made for CB. If y
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00259.html (9,041 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Omni VI+ problem (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 15:10:34 +0000
Not sure if this is on target or not, but with my VI/3 a few weeks ago a snapping sound began emanating from the back of the rig whenever I hit voice peaks or went key down on cw. At first I thought
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00261.html (8,062 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Re: Reply to W8keb (Long) (score: 1)
Author: Curt Krelic <k3ey@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 07:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Personally, I would not have given that response the curiosity you provided. Stuck in the mud old die hard hams living by the letter to the law is fine. Believing CBers are evil non human entities no
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00264.html (8,797 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Re: Solid State Amps (score: 1)
Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 11:21:23 -0500
Well, It seems no matter how I look at it , someone will say I'm wrong. I am beginning to wonder if I AM in the wrong hobby. It seems that it is overrun at times with Conceited, egotistical, know it
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00266.html (7,333 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Dudley Hurry" <jhurry@austin.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:28:35 -0600
Ken, So you're saying if I build an amp for my HF QRP rig, it is illegal?? I don't think that is the intent of Part 97.. Even if I use some commerically available parts? Thanks and 73's, Dudley WA5QP
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00267.html (10,512 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Re: Solid State Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:32:29 -0500
Whats all the hubub, bub?? What kind of grief have you been getting? I have been casually watching the thread on the solid state amp thing. I don't see the problem. Your original post about the Tokyo
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00270.html (8,294 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] DX info / Future Tentec gear (score: 1)
Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:25:06 -0500
I for one am quite pleased with my Omni 6+, and will have it for awhile. My wish as stated previously a long time ago is to wait for Tentec to come out with the next generation rig that will outperfo
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00272.html (9,572 bytes)

19. RE: [TenTec] Re: Reply to W8keb (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:55:56 +0100
Tokyo High Power is well respected here in Europe. Hello, I think you may want to research this company a little bit more. They do not appear to be the type of Clandestine company interested in marke
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00274.html (8,392 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:03:15 -0500
Wow, I did not expect so many emails between the first and the second. But there are a lot of amplifiers that hams buy and modify for ham use that are used in MRI, plasma generators, Sputtering syste
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00275.html (11,818 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu