- 1. [TenTec] TX Noise (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:27:07 -0700
- Several guys asked about why no SDRs were included, not realizing that the K3 and KX3 are SDRs with knobs. To address their interest, I've added the other three SDR transceivers that ARRL has tested
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00854.html (7,484 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] TX Noise (score: 1)
- Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:24:47 -0500
- Strictly speaking, if we're going to categorize, are they fully SDR's or hybrids which contain SDR elements? For example, are they dual conversion superhet's with the 3rd conversion being to baseband
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00856.html (8,845 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] TX Noise (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:45:43 -0400
- None of the Flex radio data here applies to the new Flex 6000 series. The Flex 6000 series is a whole new design. Carl Moreschi N4PY 58 Hogwood Rd Louisburg, NC 27549 www.n4py.com On 7/28/2014 7:27 P
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00857.html (8,087 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] TX Noise (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:35:59 -0700
- But no review yet published by ARRL. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00859.html (7,639 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] TX Noise (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:45:21 +0200
- Rob told me they're still debating how they should test these new radios. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) But no review yet published by ARRL. 73, Jim K9YC __________________________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00866.html (7,793 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu