- 1. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
- Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:08:42 -0400
- based on all the comments I've seen here about where Ten Tec is and where it's going, _______________________________________________ Now there is a reliable basis for prediction! Nearly all comments
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00853.html (10,702 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:34:50 -0700
- If the button count is correct, then that's certainly a TS-990. I'm not knocking it - I like lots of buttons, switches, knobs and other controls. However, as nice as it is that your friend with his n
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00855.html (9,626 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] TX Noise (score: 1)
- Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:24:47 -0500
- Strictly speaking, if we're going to categorize, are they fully SDR's or hybrids which contain SDR elements? For example, are they dual conversion superhet's with the 3rd conversion being to baseband
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00856.html (8,785 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] Comparing radios (score: 1)
- Author: <w4wst@cox.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 22:31:21 -0400
- In my previous post I wondered why someone would come on a TENTEC site and try to impress everyone with what they can do with their rig that is so much better than that (yuk) TENTEC junk. I didn't me
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00858.html (8,570 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Comparisons (score: 1)
- Author: "John Simon" <jrsimon@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:07:55 +1000
- I couldn't agree more! If you don't like your Ten-Tec transceiver, receiver etc, send it to me. I'm QTHR in the Call book. 73, John de VK2XGJ Well another day has passed and I didn't use Algebra once
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00865.html (7,725 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu