Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+40m\s+directional\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+40m\s+directional\s+antennas\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] 40m directional antennas (score: 1): Author: jljarvis@abs.adelphia.net (jljarvis); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:26:47 -0500; with a f/b ratio that is well less than 20dB. Azimuth beamwidth is on the order of 85 degrees. By comparison, a 'spitfire' array.... 4 sloping dipoles, folded back toward the base from the feedpoint; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00412.html (7,055 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] 40m directional antennas (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:04:13 -0500; I believe N4ZR either has or had one of these on 80.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00420.html (7,850 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] 40m directional antennas (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:10:56 -0500; Sounds like the K8UR array described by K3LR and others over the past few years. I use one K8UR dipole for 80 that seems to get the DX. Down on most local signals. Mine is mounted on a big tree but a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00423.html (8,862 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] 40m directional antennas (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:33:31 -0500; Actually not... the W9LT/K3LR design (K3LR wrote it up for QST, but I learned about it from W9LT, who thought it up 30+ years ago) uses 4 "lazy-vee" dipoles, with one driven and three used as parasit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00425.html (8,112 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]