Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Detuned\s+Mosley\s+CL\-36\-M\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Detuned Mosley CL-36-M (score: 1)
Author: nat@ajheatwole.com (Nat Heatwole)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:57:44 -0500
Hello all. A few months ago I found an old Mosley CL-36-M six element tribander atop a local tower. The owner said that I'm free to have the beam if I take it down. It has been atop the tower for 20+
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00627.html (9,395 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] Detuned Mosley CL-36-M (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net (Don Havlicek)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:35:57 -0500
Did you attach NEW coax before making the measurements? Coax, after 20 years, will exhibit some terrible impedance characteristics! Second possibility .. those traps might have lots of insect nests i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00628.html (10,654 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] Detuned Mosley CL-36-M (score: 1)
Author: VE6JY Don Moman" <ve6jy@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca (VE6JY Don Moman)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 18:43:27 -0000
Damaged feedline (water ingress likely) and oxidized joints in the aluminum tubing. In that order. It can't be that complex, it doesn't even have a microprocessor..... Yes, shows the traps are OK. 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00630.html (9,295 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] Detuned Mosley CL-36-M (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 08:39:40 EST
High SWR *everywhere* is the classic symptom of something bad in the feedline; i.e. coax, balun, connector, or weatherproofing. A 20 year old Mosley is sort of an iffy proposition in the first place.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00669.html (8,061 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] Detuned Mosley CL-36-M (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:39:06 -0500
I once took apart a Classic 36 that had destroyed itself during a microburst on an office building roof in Washington, DC (agency concealed to protect the guilty). As I recall, it had an odd feed sys
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00699.html (7,645 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] Detuned Mosley CL-36-M (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:46:01 -0600
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:39:06 -0500 Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> writes: That is the "MOSLEY MATCH" The DE is tuned to present an inductive reactance which is canceled by the capacitance between t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00706.html (7,766 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] Detuned Mosley CL-36-M (score: 1)
Author: w5ba@compuserve.com (Gerald D'Entremont)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 20:06:15 -0600
So...does it work? I went to look at a CL-205 this afternoon, which is the 5L 20M monobander that utilizes a similar (identical?) feed system. One half of the feed was missing...I'm presuming from yo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00709.html (9,108 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] Detuned Mosley CL-36-M (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net (Don Havlicek)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:24:56 -0500
How about a gamma match? Feedline is isolated from a 'physical connection' by the gamma capacitor. In the 'Mosley match' .. this is a similar situation .. the 'coax without the braid' acts like a gam
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00710.html (10,088 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] Detuned Mosley CL-36-M (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 06:05:35 -0600
The MOSLEY MATCH is a CAPACITIVELY coupled match. So is the GAMMA MATCH. Cushcraft and Wilson BOTH produced antennas with Gamma Matches utilizing RG8 center conductor and insulation inserted inside (
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00720.html (10,326 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] Detuned Mosley CL-36-M (score: 1)
Author: w5ba@compuserve.com (Gerald D'Entremont)
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 07:45:59 -0600
Tom...and others, OK...I believe! Yes, I'm familiar with both the Cushcraft and Wilson. It's just that the coupling of a short piece of RG8 center conductor flopping around inside an 1 1/4" section o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00721.html (10,461 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu