Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Failed\s+KT34XA\s+plate\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Failed\s+KT34XA\s+plate\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Failed KT34XA plate (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 13:26:48 EST; Tom, K5RC, has sent me a picture of the broken boom-to-mast plate. Send me an email if you want a copy of it. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH - Professional tower work for amateur radio stations; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00577.html (6,745 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Failed KT34XA plate (score: 1): Author: ct4nh@mail.telepac.pt (Luis Sutil Teixeira); Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 10:21:27 -0000; ct4nh@mail.telepac.pt I've seen the picture. Seems to be Aluminium... Tnx. I always use stainless stell (6 mm thick plate) in ALL antennas I have . I just throw away the original plate (normally in A; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00593.html (8,042 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Failed KT34XA plate (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:17:58 -0500; I'd like to see the hardware that was used to attach the boom to the mast. That plate is also suspect. Looks like a brushed aluminum finish, the breaks almost look like they were done with a hacksaw,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00594.html (7,610 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Failed KT34XA plate (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 10:25:01 EST; It's just the same old standard KLM stuff - 2" U-bolts to the plate; which are still up on the mast with the other part of the plate BTW. You need to talk to Tom about them. TomK5RC@aol.com Nonethele; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00595.html (7,427 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]