Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Is\s+Antennex\s+worthwhile\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Is\s+Antennex\s+worthwhile\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Is Antennex worthwhile? (score: 1): Author: davidw@copper.net (David J. Windisch); Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 06:53:06 -0500; Do any of you TT'ers out there have a short (3 or fewer reasons) pro/con on whether the 'technical excellence' found in Antennex makes the subscription is worthwhile? Despite the well-known, widely-r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00010.html (6,852 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Is Antennex worthwhile? (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 09:30:30 -0500; I share Dave's interest and concern. I was just reading a sample article on Antennex about a 90cm-long 40m monopole that I found just a little too good to be true, claiming a radiation resistance of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00011.html (7,854 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Is Antennex worthwhile? (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:44:59 -0000; Robert I kind of like these articles when confronted with claims like have been made on some antennas: http://130.94.24.217/2001/1101issue/1101skeptic.html http://130.94.24.217/2001/1201issue/1201sk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00012.html (7,363 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]