Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+LXC\s+observations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+LXC\s+observations\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] LXC observations (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 01:57:56 EST; Howdy, TowerTalkians -- Here are some notes from the field. Just saw TWO instances of antenna boom-to-mast plate failures. In both instances (different stations in different states) the U-bolts were; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00481.html (7,056 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] LXC observations (score: 1): Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (Andrew Williamson); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:28:46 +0000; Steve, Were these failures on homebrew or commercial antennas? I've seen some of the commercial stuff that I would feel uncomfortable putting a 2M beam on, never mind a tribander!! Andrew Williamson; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00483.html (7,571 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] LXC observations (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:38:07 EST; A KT34XA and Force 12 420/240. Both stations are on ridgetops with lots of wind exposure. Moral of the story? Long booms create BIG torque on the boom-to-mast bracket. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Tower Tech; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00488.html (6,776 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] LXC observations (score: 1): Author: eric@k3na.org (Eric Scace K3NA); Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:01:52 -0500; I can add a third instance. I had a KT-34XA at 130ft on a mountain ridge 1500 ft above average terrain in Maryland. After an ice storm built up 1.5" radial ice, the 90 km/hr winds that followed destr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00553.html (8,372 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]