- 1. [Towertalk] Tower + Hazer package (score: 1)
- Author: elliottr@hurontel.on.ca (Rod Elliott)
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:07:05 +0000
- Hello... After 42 years of hamming, I'm finally moving to a new QTH where I can put up a tower and beam. But, since my knees are way too old for climbing, I'm considering a hazer for raising and lowe
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00596.html (7,991 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] Tower + Hazer package (score: 1)
- Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 14:12:04 -0500
- Rod, I don't have a lot of time right at this minute, but I have the Glen Martin 70 ft package. I put it up 3 yrs ago (!) with TONS of help from the TT group. I have lots of photos and comments and w
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00597.html (9,261 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] Tower + Hazer package (score: 1)
- Author: barrie@centric.net (Barrie Smith)
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:50:38 -0700
- Rod: I've had a 70', 18" face Glen Martin with hazer up since 1989. With the help of two other fellows, we walked it up. The hazer allows me to change or adjust antennas WHILE STANDING ON THE GROUND!
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00598.html (9,112 bytes)
- 4. [Towertalk] Tower + Hazer package (score: 1)
- Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:03:00 -0500
- allow What is the potential safety risk in this? The very thought of periodically disengaging a guy cable seems like a dangerous proposition to me. I assume that *very little* tension is present on
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00600.html (7,971 bytes)
- 5. [Towertalk] Tower + Hazer package (score: 1)
- Author: joe@xyz.net (WL7M)
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 11:29:27 -0900
- I have had absolutely NO problem with this procedure. When you release the tension, you do it slowly, on each guy alternately, so the tower doesn't "quickly snap in the opposite direction". Piece of
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00603.html (9,004 bytes)
- 6. [Towertalk] Tower + Hazer package (score: 1)
- Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 16:32:36 -0500
- The tower has a set of tracks bolted to one face for the entire length, adding a lot of strength. The 70 ft tower is guyed at 2 levels. When you undo 2 guys at one level, the tower is still guyed at
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00607.html (8,091 bytes)
- 7. [Towertalk] Tower + Hazer package (score: 1)
- Author: BobK8IA@aol.com (BobK8IA@aol.com)
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:32:38 EST
- I wonder if some of the structural guys on towertalk can address something re Glen Martin Tower/Hazer packages. I have always had an intuitive problem (if not an engineering one) with GUYED ALUMINUM
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00608.html (8,237 bytes)
- 8. [Towertalk] Tower + Hazer package (score: 1)
- Author: poster@gate.net (poster)
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 20:56:08 -0500
- That is not the Hazer package that is the Voyager!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 WB4ROY Jack
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00612.html (8,603 bytes)
- 9. [Towertalk] Tower + Hazer package (score: 1)
- Author: alwilliams@olywa.net (Al Williams)
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 21:22:08 -0800
- three questions: 1. the cord to release the safety latch is very small diameter-- any problems? 2. The company spokesman quoted $400 for an 80mph wind load analysis! What have others found to be the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00614.html (8,090 bytes)
- 10. [Towertalk] Tower + Hazer package (score: 1)
- Author: joe@xyz.net (WL7M)
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 21:17:30 -0900
- Only my observations: 1 - The release cord has withstood Arctic conditions for several years, without any problems. It shows no sign of weather or UV related degradation, and works every time. 2 - My
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00615.html (9,307 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu