Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ten\s+Tec\s+S\-meter\s+readings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ten\s+Tec\s+S\-meter\s+readings\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Ten Tec S-meter readings (score: 1): Author: cbrudtk@uswest.com (Chuck Brudtkuhl); Date: 6 Dec 1996 10:18:22 -0600; Mail*Link(r) SMTP Ten Tec S-meter readings A message regarding Omni-VI mods reminded me of a question I have. (Preamble...I need no flames about this concern on S-meter readings...hi. It is as much a; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00056.html (8,264 bytes)
2. Ten Tec S-meter readings (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 6 Dec 1996 12:38:25 -0600; Chuck and the group; There never has been standardization of what signal S1 to S9 represents in terms of microvolts. Manufacturers were free to develop their own in house standard practice, or not as; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00057.html (7,930 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]