Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+136\s+KC\s+VS\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+136\s+KC\s+VS\s+160\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 136 KC VS 160 (score: 1): Author: kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com (KN4LF, T. F. Giella); Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 02:08:57 +0100; Boy if you think 160 meter propagation is complicated, wait until you experience 136 kc propagation. You get refraction off of the D layer at day. 160 will always be THE TOPBAND. 73, T. F. Giella, KN; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00106.html (6,463 bytes)
2. Topband: 136 KC VS 160 (score: 1): Author: scaroni@phoenix.it (Giulio Scaroni); Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 14:07:52 +0100; (Guys, let's make this the last post about 136 kHz since there is already a "lowfer" reflector here for those interested in 136 kHz: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer 73, Bill W4ZV day.; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00109.html (7,721 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]