Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+3\/8\s+Wavelength\s+Inverted\-L\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+3\/8\s+Wavelength\s+Inverted\-L\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 3/8 Wavelength Inverted-L (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 15:24:24 +0100; Didier, this is commonly called a 3/8 wavelength inverted-L (18m vertical and 44m horizontal). It was originally promoted by W1BB with the main advantage being that it makes a good match for 50 ohm c; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00126.html (8,248 bytes)
2. Topband: 3/8 Wavelength Inverted-L (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 18:23:02 +0100; the inverted L 1/2 wave is also a excellent ant. Why does the computer say the 1/4 L has a lower angle, maybe because the computer shows a perfect ground system with the 1/4. Jim, the NEC model assum; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00128.html (8,956 bytes)
3. Topband: 3/8 Wavelength Inverted-L (score: 1): Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (S Schieving); Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:15:41 -0600; I don't remember the exact numbers but when I modeled the 3/8 vs. the 1/8 (or so),that I now use, the 1/8 was better (including loading losses). And ,yes the 3/8 is very easy to match w/ the series v; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00130.html (6,925 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]