Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+160M\s+Test\s+Comments\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1)
Author: K1ZM@aol.com
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:50:06 -0500 (EST)
Hi Gang I have been reading comments about this past weekend's ARRL 160M test and I wish to address some comments that I have seen regarding EAST COAST participants. Some of what I have read seems to
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00135.html (9,886 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:18:00 -0800
Hi Jeff, That's the problem with the ARRL 160m from a European point of view. Jeff you get 5 points for working me , I get two points for working you, in the same Contest. A no brainer, which is why
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00139.html (8,225 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:59:46 -0800
But some contacts are worth a lot more than others, and some of us have a lot more mults available to us than others, for equivalent effort. Here in CA, with really good antennas and high power, the
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00141.html (9,870 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <jeff@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 20:15:43 -0600
The flavour of the comments seems to be distilled as - the rules make it so we (west coast) cannot realistically win - so we may as well not come and play. Huh? There are a lot of contests that favo
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00142.html (11,493 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:23:04 -0800
The problem, Jeff, is that we're not even in the same contest! Superb operators at super-stations out here get beat by a factor of 10:1 by equivalent operators and stations on the east coast. But mor
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00143.html (7,834 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 07:24:18 -0400
Clive, The only reason DX was added was that when the contest was decided upon W0DX (Bob Denniston) AKA VP2VI spent most of his time in BVI and was furious that he could not participate. So it was ad
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00150.html (9,096 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 07:22:36 -0500
Hi Guys, If each & every one of the contributors (and there are many!) to this thread about the 160-meter contest was to take pen & paper in hand & actually WRITE to his/her representative on the ARR
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00151.html (8,516 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 07:53:36 -0500
I'm not sure if WC1M reads this reflector, but a small suggestion - make that "write to your ARRL Director", rather than the Contest *Advisory* Committee. 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Data
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00152.html (9,388 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 08:07:21 -0500
Hi Pete, By writing to your director, what can he do besides refer your note to the CAC...? That latter group has the final say, anyway--so why bother with "...a middle man"? He has other things to h
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00153.html (8,528 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1)
Author: K1ZM@aol.com
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 08:08:48 -0500 (EST)
Lips on a PIG got it</HTML> _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00154.html (7,467 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:07:59 -0400
Eddy, I have been sending them (ARRL CAC) e mails for the last decade and only a few have replied with "we will look into it" but that is about it. There is something about the ARRL that they go into
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00155.html (10,133 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu