Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+WINDOW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+WINDOW\s*$/: 146 ]

Total 146 documents matching your query.

101. Re: Topband: DX WINDOW (score: 1): Author: "Milt -- N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:55:12 -0700; Bill, As Peter has responded, there are two JA windows; 1810-1825 and 1907.7-1912.5 . Until a few years ago the JA hams only had the upper 1907.7-1912.5 allocation. Because the band was segmented in; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00197.html (10,283 bytes)
102. Re: Topband: DX WINDOW (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:57:29 -0500; Hi Milt, It sure helps me. I don't make any bones about new to 160. My antenna and my transmitter have been giving me a lot of grief so I have had only a few QSOs...maybe a couple dozen. I am not a "; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00198.html (10,582 bytes)
103. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:22:47 -0800; Being unencumbered by knowledge of contest log reporting and checking perhaps I am missing something. Since virtually all contest stations use automated logging programs and these programs could get; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00199.html (10,914 bytes)
104. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:52:45 -0500; It does. Here's me with cabrillo format working herb & he was in the DX window. QSO: 1830 CW 2012-12-01 0323 KA1J 599 VP2V/AA7V 599 VP2-V QSO: 1833 CW 2012-12-01 0339 KA1J 599 KV4FZ 599 VI QSO: 1833; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00200.html (11,309 bytes)
105. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:07:16 -0500; Hi Darrell, I have started wading into computer logging and I usually use paper. After the contest I enter the info into the computer but I plan to just have the computer running and do it one QSO at; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00201.html (11,597 bytes)
106. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:19:35 +0000; Don't mean to leapfrog you guys technologically. But you don't need to interface your radio to your computer, because lots of other hams have already done this. CQ'ing stations are logged in the "Rev; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00202.html (13,110 bytes)
107. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:54:58 +0100; What a nonsense. Do you expect a station calling cq during a contest in the DX window and being called by a non dx station to qsy with that station to a frequency outside the dx window? And how many; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00203.html (9,433 bytes)
108. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:37:47 -0500; I stand by my suggestion and I don't see my suggestion as nonsense in the least. Go here and read section 6.1 http://www.arrl.org/160-meter - The ARRL who host this contest state plainly that this se; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00204.html (10,928 bytes)
109. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:40:55 -0500; I stand by my suggestion and I don't see my suggestion as nonsense in the least. Go here and read section 6.1 http://www.arrl.org/160-meter - The ARRL who host this contest state plainly that this se; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00205.html (9,768 bytes)
110. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 08:51:49 -0800; I think "tradition" for the ARRL has been to only find "DX" stations there CQing. That's why it is in the rules. It is often the first time some of the "little guns" have ever heard DX on the band. t; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00206.html (10,512 bytes)
111. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 17:52:01 +0100; I agree when the discussion is about the ARRL 160m contest only. But, how many stations outside W/VE can share those 5kHz? 73 Peter, DJ7WW I stand by my suggestion and I don't see my suggestion as no; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00207.html (11,432 bytes)
112. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:54:03 -0500; Hi Gary, I agree with your sentiments 101%, FWIW... Alas & alack, nothing will ever come of it: our Ham "society" to-day seems to have embraced the domain of society at large, in that we'd rather go; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00208.html (11,466 bytes)
113. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "N4IS" <n4is@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:55:48 -0500; Gary You have a god point, if we don't care they don't mind. I think we cc download the RBN file with all callers on the DX window during the contest, it is available in .csv, easy to filter using ex; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00209.html (9,292 bytes)
114. Re: Topband: DX WINDOW (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 12:03:28 -0500; As Peter has responded, there are two JA windows; 1810-1825 and 1907.7-1912.5 . Until a few years ago the JA hams only had the upper 1907.7-1912.5 allocation. Because the band was segmented in much o; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00210.html (10,104 bytes)
115. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "John K9UWA" <john@johnjeanantiqueradio.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:09:45 -0500; Exactly Correct Peter Put a dozen high powered EU stations in the 5 Khz Window and THEY can't hear any of the US/VE stations called them. John k9uwa John Goller, K9UWA & Jean Goller, N9PXF Antique Ra; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00211.html (9,647 bytes)
116. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:51:36 -0800; well, my radio has a dial on it that goes from 0 to 180 somewhere around 10 i stop hearing cw, which means that is the bottom of the band, and around 180 or so can hear ssb, which to me is the top of; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00212.html (11,543 bytes)
117. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: k6xt <k6xt@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 13:15:15 -0700; One sure way to open the DX window to DX is to blacklist us/ve who CQ there. At least temporarily. Which is what I do, just pass them by even when they're 40 over and I need the mult. Tough love. If; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00215.html (8,806 bytes)
118. Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: Ralph Parker <ve7xf@dccnet.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:04:59 +0000; Only in the past 4-5 years have I paid serious attention to 160m, and I thought that the DX Window had faded away and was no longer observed. It looks like I was wrong. I understand its purpose, and; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00223.html (8,212 bytes)
119. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "N4IS" <n4is@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 18:12:03 -0500; Art A DL wondered how many DX can coexist in 5kHz. Not many. << I think 5 KHz can hold a lot of DX , CW and 100 Hz BW can do miracles, however just one local CQ machine gun calling CQ stopping only 2; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00226.html (8,237 bytes)
120. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Mike / W5JR <w5jr.lists@att.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 18:34:55 -0500; I worked several EU near my noise floor (S 0-1) with my radio set to 150 Hz (Icom 756 ProII) and an omni antenna sandwiched I between stateside Ops that were S9 or stronger. Yes, the really close in; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00227.html (9,036 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]