Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+WINDOW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+WINDOW\s*$/: 146 ]

Total 146 documents matching your query.

121. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:51:00 +0100; What do you think 10 callers in Europe will do? And nobody will stop for as long as 2.5 sec. So only the strongest stations in Europe would benefit from a dx window. 73 Peter, DJ7WW Art A DL wondered; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00228.html (8,394 bytes)
122. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Mark Lunday" <mlunday@nc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:05:19 -0500; I was able to do this repeatedly with my Flex 3000. Only way was with the 100 Hz filters on max sampling, but it worked perfectly (thankfully) and I was able to hear and work KH7X and D44AC with S9+; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00229.html (8,286 bytes)
123. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Mike & Coreen Smith" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 17:36:23 -0400; Why don't folks ever name names? (callsigns) Are we such a "PC" group of humans worldwide these days that we should not risk stepping on someones' toes dare we insult them or shame them into obeying; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00237.html (9,021 bytes)
124. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: Preston Smith <n6ss@inbox.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 09:21:21 -0800; Here's a partial post I emailed to the Arizona Outlaws Contest Club reflector following the 2011 ARRL 160: "On the positive side the DX window from 1830-1835 was mostly well observed by W/VE and prov; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00244.html (9,114 bytes)
125. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: Missouri Guy <n0tt1@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 17:48:46 +0000; That's not practical to enforce via logs because some participants may be using radios that have no connection to the computer other than the key line. 73 Charlie, N0TT _____________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00246.html (7,605 bytes)
126. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 18:44:46 +0000; I am not sure we need any punitive post-contest action. Several W's-CQing-in-DX-Window was very obvious on the first night. I think due to somebody seeing our discussion here, and relating it to the; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00248.html (9,149 bytes)
127. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:20:55 -0500; Hah! That "key line" is one more connection than my radio has to a computer. My computer is actually turned on while am on the air more than it was even last year. Sometimes I'm actually *using* the; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00250.html (9,278 bytes)
128. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:45:04 -0800; i am authorized to comment on this since i have (and a photo of my shack wall can be produced if requested) a real honest sent by US postage N0TT QSL card....... after i get to the back of the yard i; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00252.html (10,363 bytes)
129. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: calarth <calarth@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:54:47 -0600; after i get to the back of the yard i have to walk through the woods to get to the ham shack. now why would anyone have his computer connected to his key line? keys use the same type plugs as guitars; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00253.html (10,584 bytes)
130. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:12:44 -0500; Hi Mike, If we use a logging program it is capable of throwing the T/R switch and then sending Morse. You have to wire stuff up so the puny little computer port can handle your grid-block and things; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00254.html (9,241 bytes)
131. Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 22:34:11 -0600; I see a lot of USA station, including a couple of regular contributors to this reflector, calling CQ TEST between 1830 and 1835. According to http://www.arrl.org/160-meter "The segment 1.830 to 1.835; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00076.html (6,663 bytes)
132. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: DGB <ns9i2016@bayland.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 06:35:45 -0600; No clarification Mike ... you're assumptions are correct. When I got up this a.m., it was filled with U.S. stations. Most of them were well known contesters too. "Sad day in the naborhood!" It's an e; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00077.html (7,379 bytes)
133. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 07:59:26 -0500; Whatever the ARRL intent may have been, the wording of that particular rule is defective, and has been for as long as I can remember. Consider: How does one _start_ an "intercontinental QSO"? Usually; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00078.html (9,145 bytes)
134. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: "Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 08:49:40 -0500; This is the way I thought it supposed to work. Actually early in the contest the DX window had little problem with stateside CQers. I worked some Europeans and other stations. On this side of North A; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00079.html (8,099 bytes)
135. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 08:53:58 -0500; I take it as that window is for DX stations to be heard without having to compete with the wall of sound coming from the states. I had a terrible time pulling some EU & AF stations when they were bei; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00080.html (10,210 bytes)
136. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 07:24:39 -0700; I agree completely with Bud's take on the contest. This was my first year of participating and I found the rules unclear and poorly written.In fact, until a friend corrected my misunderstanding, I ha; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00081.html (11,753 bytes)
137. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 12:08:42 -0500; According to http://www.arrl.org/160-meter "The segment 1.830 to 1.835 should be used for intercontinental QSOs only." I hear a lot of contacts being made between stateside stations. The rule is very; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00082.html (8,915 bytes)
138. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: "John K9UWA" <john@johnjeanantiqueradio.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 14:44:36 -0500; If you put a couple dozen strong EU stations CQ'ing in the Window then they can hardly hear the USA callers as they are all QRM'ing each other. "Back in the Day" many of the QSO's were done Split due; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00086.html (8,344 bytes)
139. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 15:55:41 -0500; If you put a couple dozen strong EU stations CQ'ing in the Window then they can hardly hear the USA callers as they are all QRM'ing each other. "Back in the Day" many of the QSO's were done Split due; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00089.html (9,648 bytes)
140. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 16:01:14 -0500; It's always refreshing to tune the window & hear the odd DX station, or two, residing therein, & working many of the "...less-than-KW" domestic stations... A welcome change from the usual hurly-burly; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00090.html (8,327 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]