Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+WINDOW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+WINDOW\s*$/: 146 ]

Total 146 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Earl W Cunningham <k6se@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:52:51 -0800; My vote is emphatically FOR the DX window from 1830-1835. May all W/VE stations who CQ there be forever blessed with lousy condx and poor DXing!! W1BB, W2EQS and all of the other old-time Topbanders; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00318.html (8,020 bytes)
42. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Jon Zaimes AA1K <jz73@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:39:15 -0500; There's nothing in the CQ contest rules about not CQing in the "window." They just say it should be used for intercontinental QSOs only: http://cq-amateur-radio.com/160%20Contest%20Rules%202004%20111; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00319.html (18,455 bytes)
43. Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 06:16:34 -0500; the "DX Window." more to alleviate the general QRM. My sentiments exactly Jon...but I wonder how many microseconds it will take for someone to say "typical East Coast comment"? Funny thing, I felt ex; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00322.html (8,478 bytes)
44. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Mark Demeuleneere" <on4ww@pandora.be>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:36:21 +0100; I worked 6Y0A during cqwwcw for my #200...he was working qrp 5 Watts, inside the DX window. I was looking inside the DX window for mults, and found him, although splatter from cq-ing EU's was heavy.; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00324.html (10,747 bytes)
45. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Joe Craig <jcraig@mun.ca>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:06:55 -0330 (NST); Bert and 160 group, Now for some more news from VE land... The Radio Amateurs of Canada proposed band plan was published in the last issue of "The Canadian Amateur". It _allows_ SSB below 1840 under; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00325.html (11,014 bytes)
46. Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: "linda doyle" <ldoyle@gwi.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:17:09 -0600; Hi agn people ,boy these dx window comments actually get me fired up to make rebuttals to comments that seem so ridiculous,folks who feel the need to have one are to me like folks who run QRP and on; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00328.html (8,227 bytes)
47. Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:28:24 -0500; last issue of "The Canadian Amateur". It _allows_ SSB below 1840 under certain conditions. I'm not sure about the reasoning for this. There may be countries which don't have allocations above 1840, b; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00329.html (8,633 bytes)
48. RE: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Ron Spencer" <ronspencer@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:45:32 -0500; Jon (AA1K) I respect your views but, yours is not representative of an "average" station. You can almost "see" Europe from there! I like the DX window for several reasons but the main one is that it; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00332.html (19,973 bytes)
49. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Earl W Cunningham <k6se@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:00:07 -0800; Someone suggested that the DX window be moved to 1820-1825 to encompass the JAs. With many east coasters saying that the 1830-1835 DX window should be eliminated and some of them complaning that ther; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00337.html (8,124 bytes)
50. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Keith Jillings <keith@jillings.org.uk>; Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 10:57:29 +0000; Jon Zaimes AA1K wrote: I personally feel a "window" is a waste of space and should be eliminated. The "state of the art" -- improved receivers, transmitters, and antennas -- makes transceive operatio; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00006.html (8,981 bytes)
51. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 08:08:52 -0500; linear, sponsor me? .......not if you are going to run an unmodified FT1000MP with a big linear and antenna I won't! At least not unless we also have a DX Window and split operation so the keyclicks; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00009.html (8,542 bytes)
52. Re: Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: "Donald Chester" <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:43:09 +0000; John K9DX wrote: Most of this discussion revolves around contests ... As for daily operating ... I agree there is little use for the window... the band is unfortunately not crowded except in contests; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00041.html (7,784 bytes)
53. Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: Ron Feutz <feutz@wctc.net>; Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 07:20:47 -0600; Topbanders, Another 160 contest in the books and the usual debate over the window. Item first: Those who say the window is silly or unneeded are just plain wrong. With wall-to-wall CQ'ers, the window; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00058.html (7,365 bytes)
54. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 06:23:18 -0800; But wait - this is the Internet!!! So - here is my "question". The window is 1830-1835 - right? When I look at the ARRL Bandplan - I see this: 1.830 - 1.840 CW, RTTY and other narrowband modes, Inte; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00059.html (7,270 bytes)
55. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:00:55 -0500; are just only mults other the aurora only way an Ron, NA is a BIG place with lots of activity. The need for the window is directly proportional to how many stations and how much population lies betw; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00060.html (8,904 bytes)
56. Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: "John" <ljdoyle@suscom-maine.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:34:19 -0500; Gentlemen: I'm getting so tired of reading this constant barrage of suggestions conserning dx windows, rules for contests,now someone wants to have 2 dx windows!! folks who spend their hard earned mo; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00168.html (7,459 bytes)
57. Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:31:52 -0600; My understanding is that US and VE stations should not call CQ in the window during times when it is possible for DX to be heard (i.e. from just before sun set to at least an hour after sun rise). (s; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00425.html (8,616 bytes)
58. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: G3SVL <Chris@G3SVL.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:25:09 +0000; <snip> Remember Phil, the bandplan is only 'advisory' in Region1 so it makes sense to spread ourselves up the band. (http://www.iaru-r1.org/05%2010%2009%20Region%201%20HF%20Bandplan%202006%20(Amended; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00429.html (8,395 bytes)
59. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: John Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:05:40 -0500; Heh, just the opposite here...trying to hear EU through all the NA "big guns" calling CQ across the band. So far here, 51 NA and 21 DX mults...things are more equal than we think...:-) 73, John Basti; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00434.html (7,601 bytes)
60. Re: Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: k6xt <k6xt@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:51:19 -0600; Out west in flyover country we rue the day. Tom is spot on. I too stay out of 30-35 for CQing so my western brethren can potentially hear something. Very unfortunate to have the 30-35 window, which m; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00349.html (7,099 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]