Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+WINDOW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+WINDOW\s*$/: 146 ]

Total 146 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Topband: DX WINDOW (score: 1): Author: Jon Zaimes AA1K <jz73@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 18:25:43 -0500; So if the League is going to persist with this antiquated rule is someone at HQ writing down the calls of all the violators? Will there be disqualifications? 73/Jon AA1K "The segment 1.830 to 1.835 s; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00041.html (8,956 bytes)
82. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ireland" <vk6vz@arach.net.au>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:12:55 +0800; ...and that loss of the DX window is sadly, dear readers, why you will seldom hear DX stations outside of Europe and North America CQing on 160m in the CQ contests. We 'search and pounce' and the lou; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00155.html (8,267 bytes)
83. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 06:06:08 -0700; A way to bring back the DX Window is to not work US stations who call CQ in the window. Boycott them if you will. Dave WX7G _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00159.html (8,110 bytes)
84. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 08:15:15 -0500; That is exactly what I did. I bypassed the US/VE stations in there calling CQ. I felt they were being selfish and not part of the fun. Gary KA1J _______________________________________________ Topban; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00160.html (8,377 bytes)
85. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:21:18 -0500; ...and that loss of the DX window is sadly, dear readers, why you will seldom hear DX stations outside of Europe and North America CQing on 160m in the CQ contests. Bit of a shame really, but that's; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00165.html (9,342 bytes)
86. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Lennart M" <lennart.michaelsson@telia.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:33:14 +0100; I thought it showed people with larger stations on the east coast have lost touch with life with smaller stations in difficult areas. It is much like billionaires making rules for the middle class an; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00167.html (9,033 bytes)
87. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:40:20 -0500; Hi Len, Yes, for sure, but keep in mind that we're only talking about the setting aside of a mere FIVE KILOHERTZ of the band for this use! Now, a 5-KHz preserve may not mean much to a super NA CQ TES; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00169.html (8,830 bytes)
88. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:41:52 -0500; So there is confused information about DX windows and digital windows and callig windows and useless windows. Once upon a time there was something called "gentlemen's agreements" and the "DX window"; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00170.html (9,226 bytes)
89. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:45:32 -0500; It is much like billionaires making rules for the middle class and working poor. It's also like those who don't pay income tax deciding how much those who pay income taxes should pay and how those ta; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00171.html (9,266 bytes)
90. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Chortek, Robert L" <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:59:54 +0000; The idea is that W/VE stations do not call CQ in the window, but can respond to a DX station who is calling there. Respond on the DX frequency unless, of course the DX is working split. Yes, and that; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00172.html (9,039 bytes)
91. Topband: DX WINDOW (score: 1): Author: "Bill and Liz" <magoo@isp.ca>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 12:29:01 -0500; FWIW, about half of the DX I worked in last weekend's contest was in the 1830-35 "window". I run only barefoot, and having some space where there are no big east coast CQ machines certainly helps the; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00174.html (8,243 bytes)
92. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 12:54:35 -0500; So there is confused information about DX windows and digital windows and callig windows and useless windows. Once upon a time there was something called "gentlemen's agreements" and the "DX window"; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00178.html (8,837 bytes)
93. Re: Topband: DX WINDOW (score: 1): Author: "Milt -- N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:47:10 -0700; An examination of my log reveals the following: Of the true DX stations worked from my AZ operating location............ 16 stations called me on my Run frequencies over the two nights, and I found a; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00181.html (9,400 bytes)
94. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Ian Wade G3NRW <g3nrw-radio@ntlworld.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 20:01:21 +0000; Without working together, we need the Government to make rules and impose penalties. Tom I'm not sure that Government intervention is a very good idea (it certainly wouldn't be in this country!), but; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00185.html (10,113 bytes)
95. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 21:18:29 +0100; The dx window was useful when only the range 1832-1835kHz was allowed here. Nowadays we can use the whole spectrum starting at 1810kHz with some power limitations above 1850kHz (75W) and higher (10W; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00186.html (9,585 bytes)
96. Re: Topband: DX WINDOW (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:21:31 -0500; The JA window? 73, Bill KU8H _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00188.html (8,314 bytes)
97. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:25:38 -0500; <snip> I'm not so sure I like the 3 strikes policy. My reasoning is lets say some AH wanted for instance, to discredit stiff competition and pirated their call using it while intentionally create int; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00189.html (9,792 bytes)
98. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Steve HA0DU <ha0du@dx.hu>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:29:38 +0100; Dear TopBanders, My license says CW can be used from 1810 kHz up to the end of the band. However, no Phone modes are allowed below 1840 kHz. I am sure most European licenses are similar. IARU Region; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00191.html (10,898 bytes)
99. Re: Topband: DX WINDOW (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 21:39:14 +0100; 1810-1825 and 1907.7-1912.5 is allocated in Japan (CW only) 73 Peter, DJ7WW The JA window? _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00192.html (8,043 bytes)
100. Re: Topband: DX WINDOW (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:00:40 -0500; Thank you Peter, That's useful information here. I now know how to stay out of the way AND... I know where to look for them. 73, Bill KU8H _______________________________________________ Topband refl; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00195.html (8,333 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]