Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+V\s+antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+V\s+antenna\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted V antenna (score: 1): Author: w7dd@msn.com (w7dd); Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 08:52:57 -0700; I think we are forgetting that an Inverted V antenna is a vertical antenna and a horizontal antenna. As a vertical antenna, it is a pretty fair vertical. Don; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00043.html (6,559 bytes)
2. Topband: Inverted V antenna (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 12:58:48 -0700; "I think we are forgetting that an Inverted V antenna is a vertical antenna and a horizontal antenna. As a vertical antenna, it is a pretty fair vertical." == Questionable as "a pretty fair vertical"; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00046.html (6,891 bytes)
3. Topband: Inverted V antenna (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 21:39:17 -0400; Hi Don, That's a common perception, but it isn't totally true. There isn't significantly more tilt to the horizontal component in an Inverted Vee dipole than in a conventional dipole at the same eff; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00054.html (7,336 bytes)
4. Topband: Inverted V antenna (score: 1): Author: sire@iinet.net.au (Steve Ireland); Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 11:51:37 +0800; Hi Don, There is some small (high angle, I think) vertically polarised radiation off the ends of an inverted vee - and a flat-top dipole - but it basically a horizontally-polarised high-angle antenna; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00061.html (7,713 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]