Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+our\s+amplifier\s+in\s+2010\s+CQWW\s*$/: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Hsu" <hsu4qro@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 06:01:45 +0800
http://www.56.com/u40/v_NTYxNjg5MzM.html http://www.56.com/u73/v_NTYxNzEyNTQ.html http://www.56.com/u78/v_NTYxNzM3MjM.html _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@conte
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00054.html (7,152 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Larry K4AB <larry.k4ab@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 16:21:26 -0600
Was that 2.5KW on the output meter? No wonder B7P was so loud! 73, Larry K4AB _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00055.html (7,233 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:38:16 -0600
Who makes that HF 2010 DX amp? Doug "Those Island days are always on my mind, Someday soon I'm going to leave it all behind." --Original Message-- Was that 2.5KW on the output meter? No wonder B7P wa
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00058.html (7,810 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:29:47 -0800
Is China allowed 2.5 KW? Jim W7Ry _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00060.html (9,483 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:36:11 -0600
The CQ WorldWide rules state that no station may use more than 1500 watts output - even if the limit for a country is greater than 1500 watts - as noted below: Total output power per band must not ex
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00061.html (10,404 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:39:40 -0800
So they are going to be disqualified then? I hope so. 73 Jim W7RY _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/am
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00062.html (11,537 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "WA3GIN" <wa3gin@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 21:45:33 -0500
Sure seems like it was more of a Marketing video than anything else... I'll bet the amp was connected to a dummy load ;-) Try playing the video backwards... it sounds like the guy is saying CQ OHIO Q
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00063.html (8,007 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:48:17 -0700
Old Chinese Proverb say You run what you can get away with or what your conscience will let you.... Yes they were very loud on 40. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Am
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00064.html (10,737 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Hsu" <hsu4qro@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:18:02 +0800
Chinese regulation is below 500W, but in contest , the club station can apply more power to SRRC. 73!Hsu -- Original Message -- From: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com> To: "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com> Sent
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00065.html (10,647 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:26:51 -1000
Well now lets see: 10 * log (2.5/1.5) = 1.76, so if they were "very loud" they would have had to been doing something very right with their antenna system, or had very good propagation. Less than 2 d
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00067.html (10,036 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:30:21 -1000
Does that mean in multi-op club, you get 500 watts per club member? Ken N6KB _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00068.html (8,307 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:17:31 -0800
Hmmmm.... I hope they DON'T get away with it.... _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00070.html (12,104 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:19:36 -0800
I don't care if your government allows you to run 100,000 watts Hsu.... The CONTEST rules say... 1500 watts or the power your regulations allow. Whichever is LOWER! Do you understand Hsu? 73 Jim W7RY
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00071.html (12,030 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Hsu" <hsu4qro@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:47:58 +0800
You are right Jim. But as I know, the most buyers of Emtron DX2-5, OM2500/3500 and THP HL5KFX are contester :D 73!Hsu _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00072.html (12,499 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: DAVE WHITE <mausoptik@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 06:42:44 +0000 (GMT)
it all sounds a little QRP to me.  Ever seen some of the Russian contest stations? Dave G0OIL You are right Jim. But as I know, the most  buyers of  Emtron DX2-5, OM2500/3500 and THP HL5KFX are  cont
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00073.html (13,313 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 01:47:12 -0500
Yup. One of these, and Emtron, or Alpha *might be sufficient for a driver stage. <:-)) 73 Roger Trim, trim, trim... _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.c
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00074.html (8,080 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:50:12 +0800
As well as all the other home brew amps that have tubes with handles. 2.5kW whether legal or not, is flea power when put against what we hear on the bands during every big contest. Those big amps are
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00075.html (14,455 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Dave White <mausoptik@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:24:00 +0000
Yes, I remember once speaking to one of the Russian gang after one of the major contests and told him how loud they were. He explained that the main PA had failed and that they'd had to run the remai
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00076.html (8,874 bytes)

19. [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 01:57:32 -0800
Well now lets see: 10 * log (2.5/1.5) = 1.76, so if they were "very loud" they would have had to been doing something very right with their antenna system, or had very good propagation. Less than 2 d
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00077.html (9,625 bytes)

20. [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 02:26:39 -0800
So they are going to be disqualified then? I hope so. 73 Jim W7RY The CQ WorldWide rules state that no station may use more than 1500 watts 3db...thanks. I'm allowed 2250 w pep..[ measured at the fee
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00078.html (9,629 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu