- 1. [CQ-Contest] 14.300 (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Mueller N2NL" <n2nl@n2nl.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:49:21 -0500 (EST)
- As an active duty member of the US Coast Guard, I'm somewhat skeptical of the usefullness of the Maritime Mobile net from a search and rescue standpoint. I've read a couple stories over the years of
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00432.html (8,748 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 (score: 1)
- Author: "Harry Hodges" <w6yoo@cox.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:32:45 +0100
- Let's watch the "cheap shots" Gordo doesn't license anyone - The FCC does. He runs a radio school training folks to be able to pass the license examination. So does KB6MT and W5YI and many clubs in o
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00434.html (9,985 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] 14.300 (score: 1)
- Author: "Martina Jamrichova" <martina18_733@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:34:57 +0000
- I was one of the station who had trouble with the 14300 group last weekend. I had came on 20m and found clear spot on 14.301. I asked twice as usually if anybody was using that frequencie. Nobody had
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00439.html (9,975 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:04:16 -0700
- According to their website they only run the net from 12pm to 10pm. So if you are going to have an emergency then you better plan it for those hours other wise you are SOL. If there is a need the FCC
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00447.html (11,041 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] 14.300 (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick, W6RKC" <ab1u@volcano.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:22:24 -0800
- It was written: Moving the net to 17 meters, or any other frequency, is not an If this is not an option, how did you get everyone to migrate from 14.313, the original MMSN frequency, to 14.300? If th
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00453.html (7,340 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu