Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+eqsl\.cc\s+patents\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+eqsl\.cc\s+patents\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] eqsl.cc patents? (score: 1): Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker); Date: Mon May 20 17:37:12 2002; N5UP apparently has filed for patents on the idea of QSLing electronically, and has made a veiled threat to shut down the Logbook of the World project through patent protection: http://www.qslcard.co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00221.html (7,741 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] eqsl.cc patents? (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Mon May 20 22:14:26 2002; My friend has a saying that the best modes of communications are the ones that involve only the two principal parties with no middle men (read HF operation vs FM repeaters). Sounds like this principl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00230.html (8,814 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] eqsl.cc patents? (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Tue May 21 11:54:55 2002; I wouldn't worry too much about anything posted about patents for eQSL.cc's system, especially what's posted at http://www.qslcard.com/qslcard/reasonswhy.cfm (I don't think that anything there's chan; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00238.html (9,161 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] eqsl.cc patents? (score: 1): Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Tue May 21 13:34:29 2002; I'm not a patent lawyer and these comments are my own, not ARRL's (repeat, not ARRL's). My personal opinion is that eqsl.cc and LOTW are fundamentally different: Eqsl.cc is a repository of radio cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00240.html (12,885 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] eqsl.cc patents? (score: 1): Author: n2mg@eham.net (Michael Gilmer); Date: Tue May 21 14:10:01 2002; While I agree technically, plenty of things get patented that are fairly obvious. It may not "stand" if there were to be a fight, but one stills has to fight it. 73 Mike N2MG can't see what; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00243.html (7,311 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] eqsl.cc patents? (score: 1): Author: k9yo@yahoo.com (Cedrick Johnson); Date: Tue May 21 11:18:41 2002; <opinion> I really don't see how someone can patent a simple Web application that accesses a database, retrieves a JPG image stored on a secondary "storage location" and puts it on the web.. If he wa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00245.html (8,182 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] eqsl.cc patents? (score: 1): Author: ei4hq@qsl.net (Cormac, EI4HQ); Date: Tue May 21 21:25:48 2002; Well what your saying makes perfect sense - to another programmer anyhow :o) 'cept for one small thing: the whole question of patents & IPR's (Intellectual Property Rights) doesn't look at the "esse; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00249.html (7,730 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]