Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Scopes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Scopes\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:14:16 -0500 (EST); I've avoided owning a scope, but the recent discussion about troubleshooting low power from an Omni D has me rethinking. Most of the gear I own now old, have managed to diagnose problems without owni; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00359.html (8,331 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:34:22 -0600; Russell, If you look around, you can find a 50-60MHz scope for $150-200 in good working shape. It may not have a good set of probes and they will cost you maybe $25. 50MHz is the minimum scope I woul; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00362.html (9,813 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:44:11 -0500; russell, Jerry is right. Let me toss in a few words here. Depending on what you're planning to do with the scope, you can use a cheaper 20 mhz to 40 mhz scope with great success and a lot less money.; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00364.html (9,991 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:54:11 -0500; Whether you would use it or not or feel uncomfortable using a scope, I cannot answer...but if you do decide you want one, let me suggest a Tektronix dual-trace 100 Mhz scope. At the e-place, they reg; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00365.html (8,402 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:17:36 +0100; Russell, There is no better way to troubleshoot a rig than with a scope. The fact is, almost any scope will do. In our most recent case, the signal we were tracing was at 9 MHz. In HF, worst case you; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00373.html (10,614 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:25:11 -0500; Oooops, forgot to mention the model number of the above Tek: it's a 465... _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00375.html (9,228 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:56:18 -0600; Many repairs can be expedited with a scope and an RF probe for it so the scope can basically cover audio. Better would be at least 20 MHz scope coverage, so it could measure low ham bands. Better sti; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00377.html (8,901 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:27:43 -0500; Having worked for HP/Agilent, you'd think I'd be pushing one of them...or a Tek version. If you can find a nice one...great! But I gotta tell 'ya....the cheap Chinese ones are now lookin pretty darn; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00378.html (9,732 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:55:46 -1000; I all you care to do is look at voltage levels and signal levels along the course of circuitry, this may be true. If you need to look at digital waveforms or making timing measurements, then you wil; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00380.html (9,132 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: "Charles P. Steinmetz" <charles_steinmetz@lavabit.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:32:24 -0500; This topic comes up periodically -- you can find some posts in the archives. Here is what I wrote in July 2010, with some further comments in brackets: The Rigol digitizing scopes have also been very; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00381.html (13,304 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:00:05 +0000; I've got a nice, very portable, Vu-Data PS935 scope (check Google for info) with probes that I'd be willing to sell - just upgraded to a BK 2160. If anyone is interested, please drop me a line (priva; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00382.html (15,028 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: "James C. Owen, III" <k4cgy_list@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:04:05 -0800 (PST); I don't know how anyone can easily trouble shoot without a scope. When I was gainfully employed it was the one piece of test equipment that was dead center on the workbench and it's still center at h; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00383.html (10,828 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:16:00 -0500 (EST); Dave, How much are we talking?? 73, Lee Having worked for HP/Agilent, you'd think I'd be pushing one of them...or a Tek version. If you can find a nice one...great! But I gotta tell 'ya....the cheap; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00385.html (10,231 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:32:02 -0800; I maintained air traffic control radar systems when I was in the Air Force in the 70s. The scope was our #1 troubleshooting tool. Due to the issues with timing and short-duration pulses, there was si; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00389.html (8,622 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Steven Kline <skline4@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:40:08 -0600; Yep me too Jim. Spent two years at Keesler AFB (Cody Hall) learning how to troubleshoot, align, and maintain FPN-47 (60 mile approach ATC) and GPA-16 (10 mile precision approach ATC). Still mostly tu; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00390.html (9,462 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 11:06:05 -0800; Interesting, Steve! Your memory is much better than mine, since I don't even remember the name of the building-inside-a-hangar where the radar classes were held. My first assignment after tech school; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00392.html (9,471 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:05:58 -0500; high 100's to mid 200's. I had a cherry HP 1726A scope that was mine at work. But, I used a cheaper 1740A, and the 1726 was like new. I sold it. To friggin big, and too much of a risk when something; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00395.html (11,983 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:52:49 -0500 (EST); Dave, I currently have a HP 1745A....had it 8 years, got it used for $200. I guess it's OK?? Says 250 V P-P max on the inputs...but if I use a 10x probe I'm good for a lot more..the way I understand; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00396.html (12,635 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:59:28 -0500; Please excuse me if I missed it... but I don't recall anyone explaining to the unwashed... What can one do to avoid getting a lemon or broken or poorly calibrated, or whatever broken, oscilloscope at; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00401.html (8,818 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:04:43 +0100; James, I would recommend that you do not buy one without your Elmer present, unless: - 1) You know the OM personally who selling it - 2) The OM is willing to give you "one week money back, no questio; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00402.html (10,690 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]