Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40M\s+beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40M\s+beam\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40M beam (score: 1): Author: G0urr@btopenworld.com (Robert Webb); Date: Thu Jan 30 16:14:32 2003; Hi everyone, I thought I woulod start my research here, as I know you lot are very knowledgable and have tried most things !! I am looking to build a 40m beam this spring. Having built some monobande; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00579.html (7,047 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 40M beam (score: 1): Author: ve6wz@shaw.ca (VE6WZ-Steve Babcock); Date: Thu Jan 30 17:21:20 2003; Robert: I have built a 2 el short boom, inductor loaded 80m Yagi with a 2 el 40 sharing the same boom. See my webpage for some design notes....maybe you can consider a similar design for 40. go here; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00581.html (6,947 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 40M beam (score: 1): Author: mark@concertart.com (Mark Beckwith); Date: Thu Jan 30 17:51:22 2003; Robert, I built these a couple months ago: http://home.swbell.net/swca/radio/New40s.JPG http://home.swbell.net/swca/radio/JA40.JPG http://home.swbell.net/swca/radio/EU40.JPG They have a small amount; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00582.html (8,829 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 40M beam (score: 1): Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (Dan); Date: Thu Jan 30 18:40:36 2003; Mark: Nice beams. Are the loading coils the small bumps I see about 2/3 way out each element?.What is the material used in the center of your elements and how long is it? Are the F12 and HyGain eleme; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00584.html (10,118 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 40M beam (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu Jan 30 20:57:57 2003; If you mean FULL SIZE elements, most of the 40M beam that LAST start with 2 inch o.d. tubing at the center (some with fairly thick wall tubing) and use reducers. I'm VERY pleased with the performance; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00588.html (8,275 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 40M beam (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Fri Jan 31 00:04:07 2003; If you mean FULL SIZE elements, most of the 40M beam that LAST start with 2 inch o.d. tubing at the center (some with fairly thick wall tubing) and use reducers. I'm VERY pleased with the performance; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00594.html (8,281 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] 40m beam (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:00:08 -0600; I am looking for suggestions or comments on 2 ele 40m beams. I am going to be putting up a Trylon 64ft self supporting tower with a SteppIR 4 ele beam and would like a reasonable 40m beam. Interactio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00250.html (7,487 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m beam (score: 1): Author: "J.Hector Garcia M" <Hector@telecom1.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:22:31 -0700; mike: i have the discoverer 72 , nice antena, works nice at 55 , i can say EU, NA, SA, PACIFIC qso's no big problem, is a good antenna , linear loading, good aluminum, around, but have a problem , th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00251.html (8,701 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] 40m beam (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:44:03 -0600; I am looking for suggestions or comments on 2 ele 40m beams. I am going to be putting up a Trylon 64ft self supporting tower with a SteppIR 4 ele beam and would like a reasonable 40m beam. Interactio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00255.html (7,715 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m beam (score: 1): Author: Jay Urish <j@unixwolf.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:39:00 -0500; I recommend the OptiBeam. It is pricey but you will appreciate it once its up. The opti has some killer bandwidth. You will hate the force12. It doesn't meet spec. Just ask W5JK and K5GH At 10:00 PM; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00258.html (8,845 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m beam (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 07:58:23 +0200; Why not build one yourself? It´s not difficult and you will be able to get something better then what you can buy. Seems like nobody even consider anything but buying in America these days. 73; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00259.html (8,267 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m beam (score: 1): Author: "on4kj" <on4kj@skynet.be>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:48:27 +0200; Even in EU Jim. The world change Jim. Jos on4kj nb : My last birthday gift from XYL was a CD " If I was a rich man " da da di da da da da da da...... Not a hazard would you believe. have of The Weath; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00261.html (9,461 bytes)
13. RE: [TowerTalk] 40m beam (score: 1): Author: "N2TK" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:30:45 -0400; Interaction was my concern too when selecting a 40M beam since it would be on the same mast as a tribander. I decided on the Force 12 MAG240N since it doesn't have a resonance in any other band. Went; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00262.html (9,181 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m beam (score: 1): Author: "Grillo's" <ah3c@frii.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:10:05 -0600; European Omnibeam home page depicts two 40M designs. Looks interesting. Is Jay (WX0B, Array Solutions) the NA distributor? What about high wind applications? _________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00264.html (10,907 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m beam (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:20:41 -0700; _________________________________________________________ Years ago when manufacturing techniques were still in the stone age, the question of build or buy was a valid one. Nowadays, with modern comp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00277.html (8,997 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]