Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ bazooka: 195 ]

Total 195 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Bazooka antenna (score: 36)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:24:35 +0000
Tom, Wanted signals are EM waves; noise signals are also EM waves. I wonder what characteristic of a Double Bazooka might allow it to distinguish wanted EM waves from unwanted ones in a way that a co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00139.html (8,235 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Bazooka 1/4 wave balun (score: 36)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:23:35 -0400
"balun... or even better, a bazooka 1/4-wave balun" at the feedpoint of a quad element, using a 50-ohm coax feedline. where can I get info on building one? http://www.w8ji.com/Baluns/sleeve_baluns.h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00117.html (8,108 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] Bazooka 1/4 wave balun (score: 36)
Author: "Jerry K3BZ" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:40:13 -0400
What is a "bazooka 1/4-wave balun" ? An article I'm reading makes reference to using a "balun... or even better, a bazooka 1/4-wave balun" at the feedpoint of a quad element, using a 50-ohm coax feed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00104.html (6,845 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] 160 Meter Bazooka Reprize (score: 36)
Author: Peter Larsen <ve6yc@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:27:21 -0700
Well, thanks for all the answers to my query!! Let's see: !!?? I was under the impression that a double bazooka would have a wider band width. I have used the RG-59 that is spec'ed out by the local c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00010.html (8,205 bytes)

25. [Fwd: Re: [TowerTalk] 160 Meter Bazooka] (score: 36)
Author: "Michael A. Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 12:17:36 -0500 (CDT)
Its my understanding that the "ONLY" advantage to a bazooka is that based upon the diameter of the coax used when compared to stranded wire of the same diameter the bazooka is lighter, but as you po
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00007.html (8,473 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] Bazooka (Coaxial) Dipole information needed. Which design is best? (score: 36)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon Jun 30 12:36:31 2003
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00553.html (9,331 bytes)

27. [Towertalk] double bazooka (score: 36)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 05:29:21 -0400
Hi Ted, A few years ago someone from this reflector sent me an IAC Double Bazooka to test. Despite fantastic performance claims the Bazooka has about the same bandwidth as a regular wire dipole, is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00119.html (8,250 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter bazooka (score: 35)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 14:04:08 -0400
Good choice. Unfortunately electronic devices, especially imported, have created a noisy world for most of us. John KK9A Thaks for all the replies, on the list and off. Decided not to fool with the b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00060.html (7,735 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] 80 meter bazooka (score: 35)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 09:15:34 -0700
Where I have my 80 meter dipole, it is in a kind of noisy spot. I was thinking of replacing it with a Bazooka antenna. I know there are no 'magical' properties about he Bazooka, but what I was wonder
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00038.html (7,274 bytes)

30. [TowerTalk] Bazooka antenna (score: 35)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 21:54:21 -0800
Hi All I've been looking at some info on the Double Bazooka antenna. I know the 'wide band' aspect has been debunked, but in looking at the design, would it be a quieter antenna? I see that low band
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00132.html (6,837 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] Cage Dipole and Bazooka Antenna Models available for the asking. (score: 35)
Author: "Michael Baker" <k7ddmjb@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:20:28 -0700
For those of you who might like to have an EZNEC 4+ file for both the 75/80 meter 8 wire cage antenna or the "True Wire Bazooka" I will send them to you for your viewing pleasure if you send me your
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00527.html (8,202 bytes)

32. [TowerTalk] double bazooka vs full length dipole??? (score: 35)
Author: Alan Wilson <ke4nu@ke4nu.myrf.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:29:53 -0700
Ok guys, what is your opinion on which antenna is better overall. Of course the bazooka is more broadbanded, but does it have more gain? as compared to a simple dipole centerfed with coax thru a balu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00581.html (6,639 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Bazooka 1/4 wave balun (score: 35)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:59:12 +0000
Are bazooka baluns forgiving enough that one can just slide a 1/4-wave of braid on the feeder, join things up appropriately & that's it? Does one assume the save velocity factor as for the feeder its
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00114.html (7,806 bytes)

34. [TowerTalk] Bazooka (score: 35)
Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill)
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 07:00:33 -0500
Thanks to all for your comments on the bazooka. The bazooka is now forgotten. Bill W5EC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00034.html (6,557 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter bazooka (score: 34)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:16:54 -0700
Thaks for all the replies, on the list and off. Decided not to fool with the bazooka. I have some #31 cores here so guess next thing is to check Jim's cookbook and try that. 73 and thanks for the hel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00057.html (7,321 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter bazooka (score: 34)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 09:31:47 -0700
Hi Tom, No antenna having the same directional pattern that you put at the same spot will be quieter.  If you haven't already done so, I strongly suggest that you wind a good common mode choke on one
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00039.html (7,662 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Bazooka antenna (score: 34)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:51:34 -0500
- snip - Quarter wave slopers need a good ground system for optimum performance. The support tower is connected to the ground - even just the lightning protection ground - and significant current wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00147.html (11,571 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Bazooka antenna (score: 34)
Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 15:26:12 -0500
YES, particularly for 40 and 80 (and of course 160), if can't get down a good radial system and you're thinking horizontal polarization, first put your time and money into getting height, then antenn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00146.html (10,263 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Bazooka antenna (score: 34)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:36:13 -0800
ANY off-center fed antenna (like the Windom) will be inherently noisy because it is badly unbalanced, which makes the feedline part of the antenna. THAT'S why your Bazooka seemed quieter by compariso
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00142.html (8,213 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Bazooka 1/4 wave balun (score: 34)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:50:52 -0700
Tom will certainly pitch in with his description of his test fixtures, which I think are a big part of the challenge. Here's the problem.. A Q of 500 implies that the resistive component is 1/500th t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00145.html (14,065 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu