Mail Archive Search: <bazooka>

Results:

References: [ bazooka: 195 ]

Total 195 documents matching your query.

81. [Towertalk] double bazooka (score: 33): Author: wa7fab@cdsnet.net (Van K7VS); Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:46:36 -0700; with a g5rv, keep your antenna tuner handy as you WILL need it for all bands. Certainly a compromise antenna but useful in some instances.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00111.html (7,735 bytes)
82. [Towertalk] Bazooka ant (score: 33): Author: ve6yc@shaw.ca (Peter Larsen); Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:45:16 -0700; I used one on 160. It was fed at 16 feet, and the ends came down to the ground. Nice and broad banded, and heard fairly well, at least to my "Newbie" ears. (less than one month as a ham) With this l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00254.html (6,839 bytes)
83. [TowerTalk] Bazooka antennas (score: 33): Author: nw9g@netusa1.net (W9SN); Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 08:09:39 -0500; Back about 15 years ago there was a photocopy paper floating around in the ham community that showed diagrams for making bazookas for each band using coax for the entire antenna. You had to short out; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00968.html (7,563 bytes)
84. [TowerTalk] Bazooka antennas (score: 33): Author: w2up@itw.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 10:18:22 +0000; How do you model bubble gum as a conductor? -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@itw.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00974.html (7,372 bytes)
85. [TowerTalk] Bazooka antennas (score: 33): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 23:14:06 -0700; Hey Barry, they work OK. You go out and spend a couple of hundred dollars for real good grade coax, cut them exactly right, and they work just as good as a regular dipole :-) Tom W7WHY -- FAQ on WWW:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00991.html (7,582 bytes)
86. [TowerTalk] Bazooka (score: 33): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 07:50:26 -0400 (EDT); Bill, Essentially, you are correct. In most horizontal phased array systems I have looked at, the 4.5 dB improvement is a bit optimistic. Some a bit over 4 dB is more like it, and you can get similar; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00879.html (8,169 bytes)
87. [TowerTalk] Bazooka (score: 33): Author: "k4sb@worldnet.att.net"@worldnet.att.net (Edward W. Sleight); Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:10:51 -0700; A way I have used to use closer spacings, yet keep the impedence up is to build the elements as folded dipoles ( which will step up the impedence by 4, or folded tripoles ( which gives you an increas; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00894.html (7,161 bytes)
88. [TowerTalk] Baluns and SWR-2 (score: 11): Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com); Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 13:20:56 EDT; Transmission line baluns are poor baluns for most applications. They are much more impedance and load critical than choke baluns, more lossy, and don't do as good a job. They are more difficult to m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00553.html (21,527 bytes)
89. [TowerTalk] 2:1 balun (score: 10): Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com); Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 19:12:41 EDT; In a message dated 7/1/01 11:38:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, realex@flash.net writes: << MIke, Since you did not specify narrow or broad band, Ill take the easy route and say make a choke balun out o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00028.html (14,288 bytes)
90. [TowerTalk] Re: Force12 (score: 9): Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com); Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:06:52 EDT; Here is one "else": Quarter wave "bazooka" coax balun increases the bandwidth. Change in its reactance with frequency works "against" reactance change of antenna with frequency. Yuri, K3BU >> In a m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00241.html (16,719 bytes)
91. Re: [TowerTalk] Broadbanding a dipole (score: 7): Author: "hasan schiers" <schiers@netins.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:20:56 -0600; Jim, The "fan" dipole, and the bow tie are examples of broadbanding without loss, assuming you are talking about the two wires being resonant on the same band. I've seen a fan dipole with one wire cu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00610.html (14,416 bytes)
92. [TowerTalk] Broadbanding a dipole (score: 7): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:57:35 -0600; Speaking of broadbanding and the possibility/probability of increased loss as the actual cause, does this apply to the dipole cut to a specific band and then running several wires in a box (for insta; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00607.html (11,808 bytes)
93. [TowerTalk] 80m Dipole ssb/cw switching (score: 6): Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com); Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 05:34:26 EST; Instead of external relays that short out linear loading for 80M suggested below, why not have dipoles cut for SSB&CW at right angles to each other or as close as 30 degrees and get an automatic and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00323.html (10,970 bytes)
94. [TowerTalk] Re: Force12 (score: 5): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 10:37:12 -0400; Judge, The beam you are referring to is the K8CC (not W8CC) Yagi. One had to be very careful adding "clap trap" to a specific design without understanding the originators design intent. In this case,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00276.html (17,146 bytes)
95. [TowerTalk] Re: Force12 (score: 5): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:37:04 -0400; maxwell analyzed that well in Reflections. As a matter of fact Walt thought the common misrepresentation.... that the stub in a coaxial dipole was responsible for increased bandwidth.... was so impor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00242.html (11,337 bytes)
96. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 meter antenna noise (score: 4): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 22:12:49 -0500; There are a few details missing that may affect the answer. Is the noise atmospheric noise or man made. "S9 hiss" doesn't sound like a description of atmospheric noise. Are you measuring signal-to-no; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00176.html (9,982 bytes)
97. [TowerTalk] 80m Dipole ssb/cw switching (score: 4): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:32:54 -0500; That statement is clearly incorrect, no matter how many capital letters are in it. The vast majority of any broad banding comes from additional loss, just as the ARRL Handbook and people like Walt M; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00339.html (9,705 bytes)
98. [TowerTalk] Re: Force12 (score: 4): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 20:04:28 EDT; You din't get it Tom, we are not talking about "Bazooka" dipole, but Bazooka quarter wave coax balun connected to antenna and fed with coax. Read my first posting and K7GCO explanation again. I got i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00243.html (9,679 bytes)
99. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole with open-sleeve parasitic (score: 3): Author: "knormoyle@surfnetusa.com" <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:36:03 -0800; Hi, thanks for the comment In the antenna I described, the antenna is ordinary wire, and the feed is ordinary coax. I'm planning on RG-6 actually (copper shield). The antenna I described doesn't have; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00297.html (8,386 bytes)
100. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Bandwidth of a 75/80 meter dipole (score: 3): Author: Mirko S57AD <miroslav.sibilja@amis.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:51:07 +0100; I'm affraid that quarterwave 75 Ohm impedance transformer is excellent approach for dipole(s) and/or single vertical, but quite useless for broadening bandwith of 4 square array. 73 Mirko, S57AD Pete; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00528.html (15,629 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]