Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ ground (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ radials: 6802 ]

Total 6802 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: RF ground radials (score: 387)
Author: "KB8NTY" <kb8nty@wowway.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:18:43 -0500
In reference to all the ground radial postings; A link to a source of RF ground radial links, all in one place without having to search the web, links are always updated. -73- http://www.rossradio.ne
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00223.html (57,073 bytes)

2. TopBand: Summary:Elevated Radials Part 1 (score: 330)
Author: laurao@vcn.com (Laura Ostrem)
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 20:03:00 -0600
This is the summary as promised. I did as little editing as possible to keep the content flowing. Pardon me please if this gets a little long. There are some good numbers to work with here, and some
/archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00237.html (34,177 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Radial Question (score: 312)
Author: "KB8NTY" <kb8nty@wowway.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:32:41 -0500
AA6VB-Bob, Based on some good replies to "test" some under the home, a thought would be to go for it-however then install a switching arraignment for those radials under the home. Could yield in some
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00059.html (67,021 bytes)

4. TopBand: Radials, radials, radials... (score: 290)
Author: n9dx@michiana.org (Larry Higgins)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 00:51:07 -0500
I must agree strongly with Steve, VK6VZ: Please don't take these discussions to another reflector (unless duplicated here). They have been very, very informative. I've been reading and storing tech p
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00261.html (7,110 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 254)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:53:42 -0400
I realize this is turning into a long article on the reflector, and overall is not really a response to an individual poster. But we are into yet another season and it's getting late for construction
/archives//html/Topband/2010-11/msg00007.html (20,714 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: buried radials vs radials on the ground (score: 239)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:56:05 -0500
Short version: Believe what you measured. Long version: We did measurements of this for understanding and designing BOGs some years back. In the upper east central part of North Carolina (contains Ra
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00214.html (14,167 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 224)
Author: Art K6XT <k6xt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:03:40 -0600
My 160 ant is a 1/4 wave 80M GP. A 1/8 wave GP. Currently 18 radials, all 1/8 wave on 160, which begin at 15 ft, end more or less 10 ft. Seeking ways to optimize flexibility I turned to EZNEC, discov
/archives//html/Topband/2010-10/msg00141.html (22,311 bytes)

8. Topband: buried radials vs radials on the ground (score: 212)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:48:09 -0500
I had always understood that because of coupling, radials laid on the ground were functionally the same on top-band as those buried a few inches. Recently, some experimentation with Beverage on groun
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00193.html (7,284 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: radials direction and antenna efficiency (score: 212)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:35:00 -0400
Hi, Tzikas Short version: Your six elevated 1/8 wave radials at 9 meter height will do better than the plan in your picture with the long 1/4 wave radials in only one direction. Make sure you have a
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00056.html (14,599 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Buried radials or non-buried radials? (score: 212)
Author: w2pm@aol.com
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:51:04 -0500
There is person who is also a ham who sells radial staples -- they work very well and are dirt cheap -- something like $7 USD for a 1/2 pound bag of 315 pcs. He is (or was) on Ebay but his email is:
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00159.html (11,483 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Deployable radials for 80/160M (score: 209)
Author: "KB8NTY" <kb8nty@wowway.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:20:39 -0400
Always enjoy RF Ground Radial conversation! Regarding the solid over stranded wire...I have found that the stranded behaves much better when laying it down as it forms to the various contours of the
/archives//html/Topband/2014-06/msg00230.html (45,423 bytes)

12. Topband: Gullwing radials and multiband radials? (score: 209)
Author: "ford" <jecford@suddenlink.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 21:16:59 -0500
Currently using a 45' aluminum tube vert with 3X15' wire capacity hat. Have about 20 random on-ground radials. Feed point is 3' off ground and mount is a treated 5X5 post with PVC pipe sleeving over
/archives//html/Topband/2010-10/msg00041.html (6,895 bytes)

13. Topband: Radials under elevated radials (score: 209)
Author: force12e@lightlink.com (force12e)
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:34:26 -0500
Good Afternoon, I would be interested in hearing from anyone who is using a 1/4 wave monopole with both elevated radials and a ground screen. My antenna includes both two elevated, tuned radials and
/archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00009.html (7,023 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Radials through heavy brush (Was:Radials over a stone wall) (score: 206)
Author: "Jeff" <w7jw@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:27:51 -0400
Another economical and light weight method of pushing wire through brush would be to use a 10' piece of 1/2" PVC or plastic electrical conduit. In the case of the electrical conduit it can be extende
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00196.html (12,030 bytes)

15. Topband: Buried radials or non-buried radials? (score: 206)
Author: "Dennis Peterson" <dennisissure@comporium.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 06:00:00 -0500
To be or not to be--TO BURY OR NOT TO BURY--that is the question..................................IMHO of 34 years playing with antennas, it has been my experience to use NON-BURIED Radials as I am a
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00154.html (10,033 bytes)

16. Topband: Radials through heavy brush (Was:Radials over a stone wall) (score: 203)
Author: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:16:50 -0500
Here's how I lay radials in the woods with heavy brush. I have a ~15 foot long piece of wooden oak stairway handrail. The kind you see for basement stairs. It's about 2 inches in diameter and has a f
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00175.html (10,986 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Radials through heavy brush (Was:Radials over a stone wall) (score: 200)
Author: Dean <k3ggn@wi.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:01:39 -0500
Brilliant Gary! Dean K3GGN ~~~ _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00195.html (10,110 bytes)

18. TopBand: elevated radials versus ground mounted radials (score: 200)
Author: sire@omen.com.au (Steve Ireland)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 06:33:33 +0800
Dear Eric (and Carl), I really enjoyed your piece - it was the most enlightening piece I have read about ground systems in my entire time on this reflector. Phil K5PC's response was similarly thought
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00253.html (8,132 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 194)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:01:11 -0400
Short version: Anyone who has four elevated radials can easily check this out. How to in Long Version. 1/4 wave elevated radials can have 18-60 ohms ground induction loss per radial. Divide by number
/archives//html/Topband/2010-10/msg00140.html (17,695 bytes)

20. Topband: Buried radials or non-buried radials? (score: 194)
Author: "k4pi" <k4pi@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:08:20 -0800
In regard to pinning them on top of the ground, I use bobby pins that women use to hold their hair in place. I go through thousands so cutting wire up got old a long time ago. It will depends on the
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00160.html (7,176 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu