Mail Archive Search: <ground radials>

Results:

References: [ ground (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ radials: 7738 ]

Total 7738 documents matching your query.

101. TopBand: Re: Elevated Radials (score: 134): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 11:52:45 EST; To Topband....forewarded without comment Carl KM1H _____________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get complet; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00142.html (11,236 bytes)
102. Re: Topband: Radials, EZNEC and far field (score: 131): Author: Frank W3LPL <donovanf@starpower.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:16:30 -0500 (EST); Hi Ignacy - There's little hope that a vertical antenna hundreds of miles from salt water can ever close the gap with an antenna built over a salt marsh or within about a wavelength of salt water. Th; /archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00082.html (9,324 bytes)
103. Re: Topband: elevated radials question (score: 131): Author: List Mail <mail10@barefoothorse.com.au>; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:01:37 +1100; I ran a top loaded vertical over elevated radials for about 10 years. I fed the vertical at the level of the radials, around 10 feet. There were eight radials, seven of which were Ľ wavelength and on; /archives//html/Topband/2021-10/msg00052.html (9,152 bytes)
104. Re: Topband: Inverted L with elevated radials for topband (score: 131): Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 18:26:12 -0500; When it comes to elevated radials, the amount of guys who have strong opinions on the subject are many - and unfortunately the amount of objective data behind those strong opinions is generally not e; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00091.html (13,702 bytes)
105. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 131): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:38:20 -0500; Hi Wes, I have also always had the highest regard for 99.9% of anything that W8JI has stated. However, I feel exactly the same way about K2AV (and, of course, Rudy too). In this particular case, I am; /archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00094.html (11,189 bytes)
106. Re: Topband: elevated radials (score: 131): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:05:42 -0700; Agree, an array is an entirely different ball game. Thanks. Grant KZ1w 73, John W1FV I have a 160m T with 8 elevated 125' radials and the currents are worst case 3:1 unequal for various reasons (nea; /archives//html/Topband/2018-10/msg00187.html (11,967 bytes)
107. Re: Topband: elevated radials (score: 131): Author: "John Kaufmann" <john.kaufmann@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:47:55 -0400; When you are using just a single vertical, some pattern skew is probably acceptable. However, at KC1XX we are using several verticals in an array and nonideal radiation from the individual verticals; /archives//html/Topband/2018-10/msg00182.html (11,882 bytes)
108. Re: Topband: Radials in the desert (score: 131): Author: Chester Latawiec <chetlat@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:24:08 +0000; Thank you to all that responded to my call for ideas. I'll keep the group informed as to what worked, what didn't and the final resolution. Good DXing 73 Chet VE3CFK ________________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2018-06/msg00126.html (10,349 bytes)
109. Re: Topband: Mixed elevated and ground located radials? (score: 131): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 09:02:13 -0800; Radials need to be elevated and insulated from ground/earth or on the ground and grounded. I tried a modeling exercise to see if a ground screen under elevated radials would improve efficiency but it; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00273.html (10,993 bytes)
110. Re: Topband: Ground Radials (score: 131): Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:42:42 +0000; I think my situation is very similar to yours. My antenna (a "130 foot doublet up 80 feet" when fed on 80 and up, but when I tie the feedline together at the base it becomes a "Marconi T for 160M tra; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00057.html (10,274 bytes)
111. Re: Topband: elevated radials (score: 131): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:26:19 -0400; Hi, Mike You've reminded me that I have pair of 2 amp FS RF ammeters (1950s/1960s era) that I need to hunt up and squirrel away before clearing out the junk around my home and preparing to move out.; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00288.html (10,159 bytes)
112. Re: Topband: Radials in the pond..? (score: 131): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:53:11 -0400; I have to agree with Tom. With 60 1/4 wave radials on the ground, you are going to have a pretty good ground anyway, and it won't matter much what you do with a few of them. In my case, the ground ro; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00247.html (9,172 bytes)
113. Re: Topband: Radials in the pond..? (score: 131): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:35:19 -0400; Hi, Randy,, Based on my experience, I would add weights to the radials that will enter the pond and extend them as far into the water as possible. My very first 160 inverted L was supported by a tall; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00245.html (9,419 bytes)
114. Re: Topband: trimming elevated radials (score: 131): Author: Dan Maguire <djm2150@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:40:04 -0700 (PDT); Lacking a good answer to Jeff's question about the preferred method of insuring uniformity in elevated radials I decided to look at the problem from the other direction. That is, intentionally make; /archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00152.html (10,663 bytes)
115. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials EPILOGUE (score: 131): Author: Buck wh7dx <wh7dx@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:42:59 -1000; There is some good stuff in ON4UN Low Band Book - Chapter 9-10 on Elevated Radials. He suggests that an elevated system would be even better above ground versus on the ground in poor conditions. Refe; /archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00049.html (10,446 bytes)
116. Re: Topband: Ground radials problem - Tnks (score: 131): Author: Eduardo Araujo <er_araujo@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 20:55:49 -0800 (PST); Joe, John and Dean, many thanks for your answer and suggestions. I need to add that fence wire used is iron and not aluminum and it was installed 2 years ago. I still wonder if the huge difference in; /archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00028.html (10,551 bytes)
117. Re: Topband: raised radials (score: 131): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:50:07 -0800; I also have a 40M GP with 4 elevated resonant radials 6" above the ground. I will be putting up a vertical dipole for 40M center fed with a choke balun for comparison on DX and will compare with the; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00408.html (10,204 bytes)
118. Re: Topband: Radials over a stone wall (score: 131): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:10:45 -0400; When drilling in stone to prevent overheating of the drill bit and tip consider using water as a coolant. Herb, KV4FZ _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - h; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00181.html (18,006 bytes)
119. Re: Topband: Radials over a stone wall (score: 131): Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:44 -0400; Be real careful when drilling at those seam points tho as the bit can get stuck when hitting the harder area around the joint and if your holding on with both hands it will twist your arms around rea; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00179.html (16,993 bytes)
120. Re: Topband: Radials over a stone wall (score: 131): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:20:53 -0400; Rent a hammer drill with a 1/2" or 3/4" bit and an extension. Takes about 15 minutes a hole as long as you have AC out there. My 3/4" bit is 12" long and Ive used it several times to bust up big boul; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00161.html (15,426 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]