Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ ground (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ radials: 7735 ]

Total 7735 documents matching your query.

161. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 138, Issue 25 (score: 125)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:25:56 -0400
Well, we both used a piece of rebar but I couldnt find a good tub at the transfer station/town dump. I made mine from scrap angle iron and my trusty Miller MIG welder. Its survived outdoors now since
/archives//html/Topband/2014-06/msg00233.html (47,747 bytes)

162. Re: Topband: Deployable radials for 80/160M - Summary (score: 125)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:12:47 -0400
Around this area small gauge Teflon wire at electronics surplus shops sells for less than PVC insulated as its of almost no value to recyclers. Partial to full reels are available. Carl KM1H -- Origi
/archives//html/Topband/2014-06/msg00204.html (15,240 bytes)

163. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 125)
Author: Brad Rehm <bradrehm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:11:26 -0600
Jerry Sevick, W2FMI, has an interesting comment about the "120" number in his book, "The Short Vertical Antenna and Ground Radial." At the end of the first chapter he notes: "...it should be mentione
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00205.html (10,832 bytes)

164. Re: Topband: "Missing" Buried Radials for a Monopole (score: 125)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:48:37 -0500
Thanks, Tom. I should have stated that in the absence of radials, the coax will radiate instead due to the common mode current on the outside of the shield. That's a given. Let's forget that I said a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00293.html (10,260 bytes)

165. Re: Topband: "Missing" Buried Radials for a Monopole (score: 125)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:46:42 -0500
Ok, let's not make this black and white, then. :-) It goes without saying that both halves of the antenna (radials and the vertical) must be present in order for the bottom-fed vertical monopole to r
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00289.html (11,606 bytes)

166. Re: Topband: Radials over a stone wall (score: 125)
Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:21:11 -0400
Thanks Bill and Herb about drilling a hole through the wall. That could be tough. It is a stone wall with no mortar. It is about 20-28" thick. It is well constructed with large field stones. It would
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00159.html (10,306 bytes)

167. Re: Topband: soldering radials (score: 125)
Author: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:16:10 -0500
Hello Jorge, There is very little current flowing in each radial wire so the wire size matters very little. In your example you would be much better off with the 120 radials than 40. Keep in mind tho
/archives//html/Topband/2011-08/msg00039.html (12,001 bytes)

168. Re: Topband: soldering radials (score: 125)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:27:06 -0400
Since the total current is divided into the number of radials you can compute the amount in each. I run 32 elevated all copper radials of #18 and 16 of a random mix and there is very, very, little po
/archives//html/Topband/2011-08/msg00040.html (11,124 bytes)

169. Re: Topband: radials direction and antenna efficiency (score: 125)
Author: john battin <jbattin@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:04:54 -0500
The more the better. John K9DX _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00045.html (8,237 bytes)

170. Re: Topband: Forestry Effect on Antennas and Radials (score: 125)
Author: w2lk@bk-lk.com
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:01:09 -0700
Charles, I have two reversible beverages running through the woods. They both follow the terrain and are about 5-6 feet off the ground on average. One of them is about 500' and runs towards JA down t
/archives//html/Topband/2010-07/msg00011.html (10,575 bytes)

171. Re: Topband: Ground Radials and an inv-L antenna (score: 125)
Author: w8av <w8av@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:24:30 -0400
Dennis: You have not reached a point of diminishing returns here. Although you see no virtual change in the antenna VSWR, the radiation efficiency of the antenna system improves every time you add ad
/archives//html/Topband/2009-09/msg00155.html (8,589 bytes)

172. Topband: Small gauge wire for radials (score: 125)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:12:16 -0700
I have been using small guage wire for radials for many years with excellent results in the Pacific Northwest. My first 80 meter 4 square had several miles of number 21 motor rewinding insulated (pol
/archives//html/Topband/2007-04/msg00039.html (8,786 bytes)

173. Re: Topband: Tuning elevated radials (score: 125)
Author: Phil & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:11:27 +0000
Ford - Dick Weber K5IU presented a paper in 1995 at the W5 DX Bash that included some work Dick had done in the area of elevated radial current imbalances with regards to remotely tuned low-band vert
/archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00042.html (9,469 bytes)

174. Topband: Elevated vs Buried Radials (score: 125)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:33:29 -0500
March/April 2005 National Contest Journal has the last part of a two-part article by K3LC. He used Eznec Pro 4.0 with a double precision NEC-4 calculating engine. Much much data, but here's a simplif
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00040.html (7,402 bytes)

175. Re: Topband: Ground Radials (score: 125)
Author: Jon Zaimes AA1K <jz73@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:28:05 -0500
Hi Fred, A long time ago at a QTH not too far away, I had a 100-ft shunt-fed tower for 160 in the middle of a large yard. I buried 200 radials that were 70 feet long on the north and south sides, 136
/archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00071.html (11,472 bytes)

176. Topband: Number of radials - elevated vs grounded (score: 125)
Author: k4iq@worldnet.att.net (John B. Mitchell)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:38:00 +0000
I too have been experimenting with elevated radials at the ridgetop tower here at K4IQ. The ground has too many rocks and old tree stumps and root systems from being cleared five years ago to use in-
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00136.html (10,262 bytes)

177. Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 125)
Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 19:13:41 -0400
Hi gang, This current subject about elevated radials is hitting home with me as I have considered doing the same thing. My small QTH of 0.6 acres on Lake Wylie, SC, affords me precious room for layin
/archives//html/Topband/2001-04/msg00050.html (8,800 bytes)

178. Topband: anchoring radials in soil that freezes (score: 125)
Author: eric@k3na.org (Eric Scace)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 18:20:55 +0300
Here is a summary of responses on this question. No particular order to responses. No one reported any problems with frost heaves. W1DXH: -- Anchors with clothespins and doll pins, driven in with a h
/archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00224.html (9,760 bytes)

179. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 125)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:32:47 +0000
To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi John, Thank you for being civil and non-personal in your comments. That prevents it from being a peeing contest. Not unless the radials, feedline, or other conductors
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00294.html (13,161 bytes)

180. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 125)
Author: jbmitch@vt.edu (John Mitchell)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 22:41:37 -0500
As an exercise, thought I'd try to write how this seems to me. From what I've read and experimented about the subject, which is not nearly as much as many here, there seem to be (at least) several va
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00282.html (12,581 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu